Coupled Braking Control Using Hydraulic and Regenerative Force Split

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional braking systems in coupled braking systems face challenges in adjusting hydraulic braking force due to the absence of decoupling, leading to uncomfortable braking experiences and wear on components.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize both hydraulic and regenerative braking forces to determine a comfortable braking force based on the brake pedal opening degree, distributing these forces to achieve smooth braking in coupled systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional braking systems are used in coupled braking systems, then the braking function is achieved, but the braking comfort deteriorates due to noticeable nodding and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking comfortVSAvoidnodding and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The braking force is segmented into two independent components: regenerative braking force and hydraulic braking force. The controller separately controls each component based on pedal opening degree, allowing independent optimization of each braking mechanism to reduce vibrations and improve comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the distribution ratio between regenerative and hydraulic braking forces based on the brake pedal opening degree. By changing the parameter of force distribution according to pedal position, the system optimizes braking comfort across different braking intensities while minimizing harmful vibrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If hydraulic braking force is adjusted in coupled braking systems, then braking control is achieved, but component wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking controlVSAvoidcomponent wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The regenerative braking system serves itself by directly converting kinetic energy to electrical energy stored in the battery, eliminating the need for mechanical contact components. This self-service mechanism reduces wear on traditional friction-based braking components while maintaining effective braking control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional purely mechanical hydraulic braking with a hybrid approach that substitutes regenerative braking (electrical energy conversion) for a portion of the mechanical braking force. This substitution reduces the reliance on mechanical friction components, thereby reducing wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If both hydraulic and regenerative braking forces are used, then braking performance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves multiple functions: it acts as a drive motor during acceleration and as a regenerative braking device during deceleration. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve improved braking performance without adding entirely separate braking mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors the brake pedal opening degree and dynamically adjusts the distribution between regenerative and hydraulic braking forces. This feedback mechanism automates the complex coordination between two braking systems, improving braking performance while managing system complexity through intelligent control rather than mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves braking performance and comfort by simultaneously using hydraulic and regenerative braking, reducing wear and enhancing the driving experience.

Implementation Method 1

the motor controller is configured to convert the motor into a generator to store energy in the battery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250303875A1Method, Device, Controller and Computer Program Product for Comfortable Braking
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250303875A1 patent drawing
  • US20250303875A1 patent drawing
  • US20250303875A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a device, a controller and a computer program product for comfortable braking are disclosed. The method includes (i) determining a comfortable braking force based on an opening degree of a brake pedal of a vehicle, (ii) determining a hydraulic braking force and a regenerative braking force based on the comfortable braking force, and (iii) performing comfortable braking on the vehicle based on the hydraulic braking force and the regenerative braking force. By way of the above, the comfortable braking function may be realized in a coupled braking system. By simultaneously utilizing the hydraulic braking force and the regenerative braking force for comfortable braking, the braking performance of the vehicle is improved, the braking process is made smoother and more comfortable, and the driving experience of a driver and passengers is improved.