Coupled Fluidized Bed Reactor for Propane Dehydrogenation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fluidized bed reactors for catalytic dehydrogenation of propane face issues such as strong back-mixing, catalyst wear, and high energy consumption, leading to reduced selectivity and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A coupled fluidized beds reactor-regenerator apparatus featuring a conical riser and turbulent bed reactor with a neck expansion structure, along with a gas-solid separation system and internal circulation pipeline, to minimize back-mixing and catalyst wear while optimizing catalyst concentration and reaction efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single form of fluidized bed reactor is used, then the reactor structure is simple, but it cannot meet the requirements of both long reaction time and low back-mixing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor structureVSAvoidreaction time and back-mixing control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into two distinct sections: a riser section for initial reaction and a turbulent bed reactor section for continued reaction. This segmentation allows each section to perform its specific function optimally - the riser provides low back-mixing conditions while the turbulent bed ensures sufficient reaction time through intense gas-solid contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines two different reactor types (riser and turbulent bed reactor) into a single integrated system. The riser connects to the turbulent bed reactor, creating a coupled system that merges the advantages of both configurations to achieve both low back-mixing and sufficient reaction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If a fast fluidized bed reactor is used, then the reaction time is short, but the temperature distribution is uneven and back-mixing is serious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction timeVSAvoidtemperature distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the reactor are designed with different characteristics to optimize local conditions. The riser section provides one type of flow regime while the turbulent bed reactor section provides intense mixing and heat transfer, creating locally optimized conditions throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-phase fast fluidized bed to a two-stage system that adds spatial dimensionality to the reaction process. By distributing the reaction across two distinct zones with different flow characteristics, the system achieves better temperature control while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If a dense phase bed is used, then the catalyst concentration is high, but the back-mixing is more serious and gas-solid contact effect is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst concentrationVSAvoidback-mixing and gas-solid contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor operates in different flow regimes in different sections. The riser section operates with lower solids concentration for better flow characteristics, while the turbulent bed reactor section operates with high solids concentration for maximum catalyst utilization, dynamically adapting conditions to local requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key operating parameters (gas velocity, solids concentration) between different reactor sections. The riser uses lower gas velocity and moderate solids concentration, while the turbulent bed reactor uses higher gas velocity and high solids concentration to optimize both catalyst contact and reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional fluidized bed reactor is used, then the equipment cost is low, but the catalyst wear is serious and energy consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidcatalyst wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified turbulent bed reactor design that replicates the intense gas-solid contact of laboratory-scale reactors at industrial scale. This approach achieves high catalyst utilization and low wear without requiring complex expensive equipment, maintaining cost-effectiveness while improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus ensures sufficient reaction time, reduces catalyst wear, and enhances product selectivity and yield, while also lowering energy consumption and construction costs.

Implementation Method 1

a gas-solid separation system including a cyclone separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

conventional fluidized bed reactor for catalytic dehydrogenation of propane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

catalytic dehydrogenation of propane refers to converting propane into propylene and hydrogen through catalytic heat absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20240017232A1Coupled fluidized beds reactor-regenerator apparatus for catalytic dehydrogenation of propane
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 CHINA UNIV OF PETROLEUM (BEIJING)
  • US20240017232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017232A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A coupled fluidized beds reactor-regenerator apparatus for catalytic dehydrogenation of propane. The fluidized bed reactor comprising a raw material delivery system, a pre-rising system, a reaction system, a gas-solid separation system and an internal circulation pipeline, the reaction system includes a conical riser and a turbulent bed reactor; the raw material delivery system, the pre-rising system, the conical riser, the turbulent bed reactor, and the gas-solid separation system are consecutively connected in this order from bottom to top; the bottom outlet of the gas-solid separation system is connected to the inlet of the internal circulation pipeline, and the outlet of the internal circulation pipeline is connected to the raw material delivery system and/or the reaction system. The coupled fluidized beds reactor-regenerator apparatus for catalytic dehydrogenation of propane includes the fluidized bed reactor, a gas-solid airlift loop regenerator, a recirculation inclined pipe and a regeneration inclined pipe.