Automated Coupler Shock Isolator for Decoupling Impact Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vibration testing units fail to prevent shock transfer between coupler parts during decoupling, leading to potential damage of test components due to excess shock energy.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a shock isolator system with a bushing and a compressive fit rod made of elastomeric material, which is disabled during coupling and activated during decoupling to absorb excess shock energy, preventing shock transfer between coupler parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional couplers are used for automated coupling and decoupling, then the coupling operation can be automated, but shock transfer occurs during decoupling that may damage test components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated coupling and decouplingVSAvoidshock transfer during decoupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The shock isolator is pre-installed between the upper and lower coupler parts, positioned to remain inactive during coupling but automatically activate during decoupling to cushion the shock before it reaches the test component. The elastomeric material is pre-compressed during coupling and then expands to absorb shock energy during decoupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The shock isolator acts as an intermediary element between the upper and lower coupler parts. During decoupling, when the coupler parts separate, the shock isolator mediates the interaction by absorbing shock energy through elastomeric deformation, preventing direct shock transfer between the rigid coupler parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a shock isolator is added to prevent shock transfer, then component protection is improved, but the overall vibration performance during testing may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protection during decouplingVSAvoidvibration performance during testing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The shock isolator transitions between two dynamic states: during coupling, the elastomeric material is compressed and the isolator is effectively disabled, allowing full vibration transmission; during decoupling, the isolator expands and activates to absorb shock energy. This dynamic adaptation ensures the isolator only engages when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shock isolator provides localized shock absorption specifically at the coupling interface between upper and lower coupler parts, while leaving the rest of the vibration testing system unchanged. The elastomeric material is positioned only where shock occurs during decoupling, maintaining vibration performance elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the compressive fit rod is made fully compressible, then shock absorption is improved, but the compression profile becomes non-linear affecting vibration performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock energy absorptionVSAvoidcompression profile linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Only a specific portion of the compressive fit rod (the upper portion) is made compressible with elastomeric material, while the lower portion remains rigid for structural support. The compressible portion is positioned to absorb shock during decoupling, while the non-compressible lower portion maintains alignment and provides a linear compression profile during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The compressive fit rod is segmented into two functional portions: an upper compressible portion made of elastomeric material for shock absorption, and a lower non-compressible portion for structural support and alignment. This segmentation allows the rod to provide both shock absorption and maintain compression profile linearity during vibration testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shock isolator effectively absorbs excess shock energy during decoupling, preventing damage to test components without affecting the overall vibration performance during testing.

Implementation Method 1

The compressive fit rod is formed of an elastomeric material that is able to be repeatedly compressed and expanded without permanent deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12146543B2Automated decoupling shock isolation for vibration couplers
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 RAYTHEON CO
  • US12146543B2 patent drawing
  • US12146543B2 patent drawing
  • US12146543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shock isolator is arranged between two automated coupler parts in a vibration testing unit. When the coupler parts are engaged and coupled during vibration testing of a component, the shock isolator is disabled, and when the coupler parts are disengaged and decoupled after vibration testing, the shock isolator is activated to absorb excess shock energy and prevent shock transfer between the coupler parts that would damage the test component. The shock isolator includes a bushing that is inserted in a lower part of the two automated coupler parts and a compressive fit rod that is press-fit into the bushing. The bushing has a chamfered volume and the compressive fit rod has a corresponding compressible volume that is displaced into the chamfered volume to disable the shock isolator. After vibration testing, the compressive fit rod is expandable to a regular shape to activate the shock isolator.