Coupling Brake Hydraulic Circuit for Modulated Emergency Parking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Regulation EU 2015/68 poses challenges for implementing parking brake and emergency brake functions in vehicles equipped with a coupling, particularly in ensuring zero pressure in the supplementary line when the parking brake is actuated and modulatable braking when the vehicle speed is greater than 40 km/h, especially when the emergency brake function is fulfilled by the parking brake.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where the pressure in the control line and supplementary line are driven based on a setpoint applied to the parking brake, with specific pressure conditions defined by C1, C2, and C3 values, allowing for zero pressure, constant non-zero pressure, and proportional braking pressure, adaptable to the wear of the hydraulic braking system, and controlled by a computer via valves to manage the braking system effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the parking brake is used to fulfill the emergency brake function, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to generate modulatable braking on the trailer is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking system structureVSAvoidmodulatable braking capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the braking pressure adaptable and variable through electronic control. The control unit dynamically adjusts the braking pressure in the control line based on vehicle speed and braking demand, enabling the parking brake to provide modulatable braking on the trailer while maintaining system simplicity. This resolves the contradiction by allowing a single brake system to perform multiple functions through dynamic control rather than requiring separate fixed-function brake systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of braking pressure from fixed to variable through electronic control. By using a control unit that adjusts pressure based on vehicle speed (particularly above 40 km/h) and braking demand, the system enables modulatable braking on the trailer using the parking brake infrastructure. This parameter change allows one brake system to fulfill multiple regulatory requirements without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If the parking brake is actuated to maximum, then the braking force on the vehicle is improved, but the pressure in the supplementary line must be zero which limits coupling brake control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidcoupling brake control
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the braking control into two independent lines: the control line and the supplementary line. The control line receives dynamic pressure control from the control unit for modulated braking, while the supplementary line maintains its independent pressure supply for coupling brake control. This segmentation allows the parking brake to be actuated to maximum for strong vehicle braking while the supplementary line pressure can be independently managed to control the coupling brakes, resolving the contradiction between braking force and coupling control versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that manages the interaction between the parking brake actuation and the supplementary line pressure. When the parking brake is applied, the control unit coordinates the pressure distribution between the control line and supplementary line, ensuring that coupling brakes can still be controlled through the supplementary line while the vehicle receives the required braking force. This intermediary control resolves the conflict between maximum braking force and coupling brake control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a fixed pressure is supplied by the pump in the supplementary line, then the system simplicity is improved, but the ability to provide modulatable braking above 40 km/h is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure supply systemVSAvoidspeed-dependent braking control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the braking pressure adaptable and variable through electronic control. The control unit dynamically adjusts the braking pressure in the control line based on vehicle speed and braking demand, enabling the parking brake to provide modulatable braking on the trailer while maintaining system simplicity. This resolves the contradiction by allowing a single brake system to perform multiple functions through dynamic control rather than requiring separate fixed-function brake systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical pressure supply system with an electronically controlled system. Instead of using a mechanical pump with variable displacement or multiple pressure stages, the system uses a control unit with electronic sensors and actuators to dynamically adjust pressure in the control line. This substitution of mechanical complexity with electronic control achieves speed-dependent modulated braking while keeping the overall system simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11827198B2Emergency hydraulic braking method and circuit for coupling
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 POCLAIN HYDRAULICS IND
  • US11827198B2 patent drawing
  • US11827198B2 patent drawing
  • US11827198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for driving a parking brake of a vehicle (V) wherein:for a setpoint between 0 and C1, the control pressure (200) is zero, and the supplementary pressure (100) is non—zero constant;for a setpoint between C1 and C3, the control pressure is proportional to the setpoint,for a setpoint between C2 and Cmax, the supplementary pressure is zero;said values being such that0<C1<C2<Cmax, and0<C1<C3<Cmax.