Courier Service Integration with Dynamic Fulfillment Options

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During peak time periods, courier services face challenges in fulfilling delivery orders due to a shortage of available couriers, leading to inefficiencies in the delivery process.

Innovation Solution

The integration of fulfillment options into customer applications, including delivery, pickup, and dine-in options, with dynamic pricing and incentives based on courier availability, location, and customer history, to manage demand and optimize delivery routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the courier service provides standard delivery for each order, then delivery coverage is comprehensive, but the system cannot handle peak demand periods due to limited courier availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery coverageVSAvoidorder fulfillment capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts delivery options and pricing based on real-time courier availability. During peak periods, the service transitions from guaranteeing standard delivery to offering alternative fulfillment methods (pickup, dine-in) with dynamic pricing that reflects current operational capacity, thereby adapting to varying demand conditions without overpromising

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters including delivery pricing, available fulfillment options, and service levels based on courier availability metrics. When couriers are scarce, the system modifies pricing structures and offers incentives for alternative fulfillment methods, effectively managing demand through parameter adjustment rather than rigid service guarantees

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the courier service accepts multiple orders during peak periods, then customer demand is met, but delivery times increase and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of orders acceptedVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system accepts more orders than can be fulfilled through standard delivery by offering partial fulfillment options. Customers can choose pickup or dine-in alternatives that don't require courier delivery, allowing the system to accept high order volumes while managing actual delivery throughput to maintain efficiency and timely completion for those who choose delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces alternative fulfillment intermediaries (customer self-pickup, dine-in service) that bypass the courier delivery bottleneck. These intermediaries allow orders to be fulfilled without consuming courier resources, effectively decoupling order acceptance from delivery capacity constraints and reducing delivery times for courier-handled orders

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the courier service offers multiple fulfillment options, then customer flexibility increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal order management platform that handles multiple fulfillment types (delivery, pickup, dine-in) through a single integrated interface. This multi-functional system consolidates what could be separate complex systems into one unified platform, managing diverse fulfillment options through common processes and a single customer interaction point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback loops to monitor courier availability, order patterns, and fulfillment performance across all options. This feedback informs dynamic pricing adjustments and option availability decisions, creating a self-regulating system that manages complexity through data-driven automation rather than manual coordination of multiple fulfillment channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9928540B1System for integrating courier service with customer applications
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 DOORDASH INC
  • US9928540B1 patent drawing
  • US9928540B1 patent drawing
  • US9928540B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques to enable the integration of a courier service with a customer application. To integrate a courier service with a customer application, a system may receive a plurality of orders that are to be fulfilled by delivery along with a plurality of locations associated with a plurality of courier devices. The system can then generate a proposal for an order that is based on the plurality of orders and the plurality of locations. In some instances, the system generates the proposal to include one or more options for fulfilling the order, such as delivery by a courier, pickup by a customer, or dine-in by the customer. In some instances, the system further determines a cost associated with each of the options and generates the proposal to include the respective costs.