Course Impact Estimation via Candidate Distance Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tools lack accuracy in determining a member's chances of obtaining a job, leading to inefficient and costly decisions regarding additional coursework or certifications, as both recruiters and members are incentivized to be inclusive rather than precise in matching job postings with candidate qualifications.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning system calculates a 'distance' score by creating a perfect candidate for a job and comparing it to actual candidates, using similarity scores and contextual adjustments to quantify the likelihood of job attainment, thereby providing a more accurate assessment of job prospects with and without additional qualifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional search and filter tools are used to match job postings with candidate profiles, then the process is simple and accessible, but the accuracy of matching is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a course evaluator as an intermediary component that bridges the gap between course information and job matching. This mediator analyzes course descriptions, identifies relevant skills, and quantifies their impact on job prospects, enabling more accurate matching without requiring complex direct analysis between all job-candidate pairs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual search and filter mechanisms with an automated machine learning-based system. The course evaluator uses algorithms to process course information, determine skill relevance, and calculate impact scores, substituting mechanical manual evaluation with computational analysis for higher precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If members take additional courses or certifications to improve job prospects, then their chances of obtaining the job increase, but the time and financial cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob attainment likelihoodVSAvoidtime investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the course evaluator continuously analyzes course information, determines skill relevance to job requirements, and quantifies the impact on job prospects. This feedback loop provides members with actionable information about the expected return on investment for each course, enabling informed decisions about time and financial commitments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative course information into quantitative parameters by assigning impact scores to courses based on their relevance to job requirements. By converting course value into measurable parameters (impact score, time investment, cost), the system enables rational comparison and optimization of educational investments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If recruiters use inclusive filtering to cast a wide net for candidates, then the number of potential candidates increases, but the precision of candidate selection decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of candidatesVSAvoidcandidate selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the candidate evaluation process into distinct components: course analysis, skill identification, and impact quantification. By breaking down the complex evaluation into manageable segments, the system can maintain comprehensive coverage of all candidates while providing precise assessments through structured analysis of individual courses and skills

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11068848B2Estimating effects of courses
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11068848B2 patent drawing
  • US11068848B2 patent drawing
  • US11068848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A member profile including a vector containing a field for each of a plurality of skills and a rating of one or more of the skills in the vector for a member of a social networking service is obtained. A first distance indicating a vector distance between the vector of the member profile and a vector of a hypothetical member profile representing the perfect job candidate is obtained. A hypothetical member profile for the member is created by combining the vector of the member profile with the indication of how each of the one or more skills is improved through taking the course from course information. A second distance between the member and the hypothetical perfect candidate for the job is obtained, and the difference between the first distance and the second distance is calculated to determine an estimate of how much the course will increase the member's job chances.