Cover Closure Detection in Waterproof Electronic Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices, especially those providing waterproofing functions, face malfunctions due to incomplete covering of battery, connector, or socket covers, which allows liquid ingress and is not easily detectable by users.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device equipped with a detection system that identifies incomplete covering of battery, connector, or socket covers by analyzing signal distortions and informs the user through visual, auditory, or tactile notifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the battery cover, connector cover, or socket cover is made compact to improve portability, then the device size is reduced, but the covering completeness becomes harder to verify by the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidcovering completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated detection system using sensors (such as optical sensors, capacitive sensors, or magnetic sensors) that automatically detect whether the cover is completely closed. The detection unit sends signals to the controller, which then provides appropriate feedback to the user, eliminating the need for users to manually verify cover closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection system between the cover and the user. This intermediary system (comprising sensors, controllers, and notification mechanisms) acts as a mediator that translates the physical state of the cover into actionable information for the user, solving the problem of difficult verification in compact devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If the cover design is simplified to reduce manufacturing complexity, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the reliability of waterproofing function deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing complexityVSAvoidwaterproofing function
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-verification system where the device automatically checks its own cover closure status using integrated sensors and controllers. The system provides self-diagnosis capability, notifying users when the cover is improperly closed, thereby maintaining waterproofing reliability without requiring complex manual verification procedures during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms (visual, auditory, or tactile notifications) that inform users about the cover closure status. This feedback loop ensures that even with simplified cover designs, the waterproofing function remains reliable by alerting users to improper closure, allowing them to correct the issue before water damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Length of stationary object

If the cover is made thin to reduce device thickness, then the device becomes more portable, but the detection of incomplete covering becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice thicknessVSAvoidcovering detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical detection methods (which would be ineffective with thin covers) with electronic sensing technologies. Optical sensors, capacitive sensors, or magnetic sensors can detect the presence and position of thin covers through non-contact means, maintaining high detection accuracy regardless of cover thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in physical parameters (such as optical properties, capacitive values, or magnetic field characteristics) that occur when the cover is properly closed. By monitoring these parameter changes, the system can accurately detect cover closure status even when the cover is extremely thin, as the parameter changes remain detectable despite reduced material thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents liquid ingress and subsequent malfunctions by accurately detecting incomplete coverings and alerting users, ensuring proper closure and maintaining device functionality.

Implementation Method 1

determining whether the cover part is normally coupled to the electronic device based on an attribute of the received second signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal analysis:

Data Source

PatentEP3068113B1Electronic device and operation method thereof
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP3068113B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3068113B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3068113B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

An electronic device, a control method thereof, and a computer-readable medium. The electronic device may include a main body and a cover part coupable to the main body and configured to be attached to and detached from the main body. The electronic device further includes a controller configured to control to output a first signal for determining a coupling state of the cover part with respect to the electronic device, receive a second signal corresponding to the first signal, and determine the coupling state of the cover part with respect to the electronic device based on attributes of the second signal.