Cover Crop Duration Estimation Using ICCI and Multi-Source Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in accurately detecting and estimating the duration of cover crops due to confusion with main crops, weeds, snow cover, and dormant periods, leading to errors in monitoring and incentivization programs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing satellite remote sensing, proximal sensing, agro-meteorological observations, and phenology indicators, combined with machine learning models, to precisely identify and estimate cover crop duration, considering factors like snow cover and dormant periods, and generate an Integrated Cover Crop Index (ICCI) for incentivization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If simple vegetation index threshold (NDVI) is used to detect cover crop, then detection process is simple, but detection accuracy deteriorates due to confusion with weeds and sparse vegetation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process simplicityVSAvoidcover crop detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple stages: first separating main crop from fallow land using NDVI threshold, then detecting cover crop only in identified fallow periods. This segmentation allows simple thresholding to work effectively for its specific purpose while more sophisticated methods handle the actual cover crop detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary separation of main crop and fallow land using simple NDVI thresholding before applying cover crop detection. This preliminary action creates a filtered context where cover crop detection can focus on specific time periods and locations, improving accuracy without requiring complex algorithms throughout the entire process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If machine learning model is applied to detect cover crop, then detection accuracy improves, but false positives increase due to confusion with main crop and late main crops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover crop detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into distinct phases: main crop detection phase using ML models, followed by fallow period identification, and finally cover crop detection. By segmenting the temporal and spatial context, the system applies ML models appropriately while using simpler methods where they would cause false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and separation of main crop using ML models and phenology indicators before proceeding to cover crop detection. This preliminary action establishes a clean baseline, ensuring that subsequent cover crop detection operates on data where main crop has already been accounted for, reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If snow cover and dormant period are not considered, then detection process is simpler, but cover crop duration estimation becomes inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process complexityVSAvoidcover crop duration estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces temperature data and phenology indicators as intermediary variables to mediate between raw satellite imagery and cover crop duration estimation. These intermediaries help distinguish between snow cover/dormant periods and actual cover crop presence, improving accuracy without requiring direct complex analysis of all raw data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for detection based on environmental conditions. During periods with snow or dormancy, temperature and phenology parameters are incorporated to adjust the detection criteria. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows accurate duration estimation while keeping the base detection process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4435733B1Method and system for estimation of cover crop duration and integrated cover crop index (ICCI)
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • EP4435733B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4435733B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4435733B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Precise estimation of duration of cover crop is a challenge considering multiple factors contributing to the same and complexity involved in capturing them in the estimation process. A method and system for estimation of cover crop duration and generating Integrated Cover Crop Index (ICCI) is disclosed. Firstly, the maincrop is identified and associated time series data is eliminated to avoid false positives. Detection of type of cover crop and its exact duration is derived by integrated use of satellite remote sensing data, sensor data, field observations and phenology based indicators. Duration of cover crop is estimated considering the impact of snow cover, dormant period etc., by integrated use of remote sensing and sensor data along with local domain crop knowledge of the region. The ICCI provides quantitative measure for cover crop effort and can be used for incentivizing farmers following sustainable cropping practices.