Surface Cover Drum with Bead Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surface covering devices with fixed drums cause premature wear and additional work due to friction during deployment and removal, and lack effective securing mechanisms for longitudinal edges, which can lead to safety issues and contamination.

Innovation Solution

A device with a drum mounted on a longitudinal-translation mechanism, equipped with beads and engagement shoes that ensure correct positioning and locking of longitudinal edges into rails, using deflection surfaces and flexible belts to guide and secure the beads under flanges, preventing slippage and ensuring secure anchoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a fixed drum is used to deploy and remove the cover, then the cover can be automatically deployed and removed, but the cover slides over the surface causing premature wear and additional friction work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic deployment and removalVSAvoidfriction work
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The drum is mounted on a translation mechanism that allows it to move longitudinally along the surface. This dynamic positioning enables the drum to follow the cover's deployment path, transforming the static fixed-drum system into a dynamic mobile-drum system that eliminates sliding friction while maintaining automatic operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A translation mechanism acts as an intermediary between the fixed support structure and the mobile drum. This intermediary component enables the drum to translate along rails while being driven by a motor, solving the contradiction between automatic operation and friction reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If a mobile drum with translation mechanism is used, then friction and wear are reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction workVSAvoidtranslation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover itself acts as a flexible film that guides the drum's movement. The drum follows the contour of the deployed cover, allowing the cover's flexibility to simplify the translation mechanism by eliminating the need for complex guidance systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The translation mechanism is designed to move the drum along a path that maintains constant tension and uniform distribution of forces. By keeping the system in a state of equipotentiality, the complexity of controlling the translation is reduced while maintaining energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Device complexity

If longitudinal edges are not secured, then the device is simpler, but safety issues and contamination occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring mechanismVSAvoidsafety and contamination prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cover's longitudinal edges are segmented with protruding beads that can be independently engaged by locking mechanisms. This segmentation allows each edge to be secured separately, improving safety without requiring a complex unified securing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The beads on the cover edges serve a dual function: they guide the cover during deployment and automatically engage with the locking mechanisms. This self-service feature eliminates the need for separate guidance and securing systems, maintaining simplicity while ensuring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If beads are used on longitudinal edges with locking mechanisms, then safety and contamination prevention are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and contamination preventionVSAvoidlocking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is merged with the translation mechanism, using the same motor and control system to perform both translation and locking functions. This consolidation reduces device complexity while maintaining safety and contamination prevention capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The flanges on the rails serve multiple functions: they guide the beads during deployment, engage with the beads for locking, and provide structural support. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, simplifying the overall device while ensuring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10961773B2Device for covering a surface including interlocking means
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 BECOFLEX
  • US10961773B2 patent drawing
  • US10961773B2 patent drawing
  • US10961773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device (1) for covering a surface is provided. The device includes: (a) a cover (10) of which each longitudinal edge is provided with a bead (12); (b) a rotatably mounted drum (2) capable of winding or unwinding the cover, movable on rails placed on either side of said surface; and (c) a system for continuously locking/unlocking the bead in the rails during the translation of the drum.