Cover Slip Sticking Device Compatibility Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing cover slip sticking devices face issues with sealing errors, such as bubble formation and peeling, due to mismatches between the clearing agent and the cover film or cover glass, which can damage specimens and reduce microscopy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A cover slip sticking device with a dipping bath for specimens, a holder for cover slips, and a system for reading and matching cover slip information with the clearing agent, including a determination unit to ensure compatibility, notification for operators, and storage for traceability and expiration date management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a clearing agent is used to dissolve the sealing agent on the cover film or cover glass, then the sealing process can be performed, but if the combination of clearing agent and cover slip type is not suitable, bubbles may be mixed and the cover film or cover glass may be peeled off after sealing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing qualityVSAvoidcompatibility between clearing agent and cover slip type
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system reads the type information from the holder (e.g., via barcode or RFID) and automatically verifies compatibility with the clearing agent in the dipping bath. If incompatibility is detected, the system provides feedback to the operator through a display or notification, preventing the sealing process from proceeding with mismatched combinations, thus avoiding bubbles and peeling issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The compatibility check is performed before the sealing process begins. The system pre-verifies that the clearing agent in the dipping bath matches the cover slip type in the holder, and only allows the process to proceed when compatibility is confirmed, preventing sealing errors before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the sealing agent and clearing agent combination is not suitable, then bubbles may be mixed and peeling may occur, but if the mismatch is not detected, the specimen may be dried and damaged or bubbles may narrow the microscopy range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecimen damage and bubble formationVSAvoidcompatibility verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holder itself carries type information (via barcode, RFID tag, or other identification) that enables the system to automatically verify compatibility without requiring manual intervention or complex external databases. The system uses this self-provided information to perform the compatibility check and prevent harmful outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The type information on the holder acts as an intermediary that bridges the clearing agent selection and cover slip compatibility. This information mediator enables automatic verification without requiring direct complex interaction between the operator and multiple parameters, simplifying the overall system while preventing specimen damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If sealing errors occur due to mismatch, then the process must be repeated, but this causes loss of time and reduces work efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoidtime for reprocessing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The compatibility verification is performed as a preliminary check before the sealing process begins. By confirming that the clearing agent and cover slip type are compatible in advance, the system prevents sealing errors that would require reprocessing, thereby eliminating time loss and maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback on compatibility status before allowing the process to proceed. This pre-process feedback mechanism prevents the initiation of incompatible sealing operations, avoiding the need for reprocessing and the associated time loss, thus maintaining efficient workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11698379B2Cover slip sticking device
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 SAKURA SEIKI
  • US11698379B2 patent drawing
  • US11698379B2 patent drawing
  • US11698379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is an object to provide a cover slip sticking device capable of improving matching between types of clearing agents and cover slips. As a means for solving the problem, a cover slip sticking device includes a dipping bath (21) in which slide glasses (22) on which specimens are attached are housed to be dipped in a clearing agent, a holder (11) having a cover slip (10) and cover slip information (14), a mounting part (C) on which the holder is mounted, a sticking part (B) sticking the cover slip (10) taken out from the holder (11) on the slide glass (22), a reading unit (62) reading the cover slip information (14), a storage unit (65) storing a type of the clearing agent and matching information between types of clearing agents and types of cover slips and a determination unit (66) comparing the cover slip information (14) read by the reading unit (62) and the type of the clearing agent stored in the storage unit (65) with the matching information to determine whether the types match with each other or not.