Architectural Covering Proximity Detection for Accurate Remote Pairing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In structures with multiple architectural structure coverings, users face difficulty in determining the target covering for remote control due to the challenge of identifying correct pairings between user devices and coverings, leading to inefficient interaction and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a user device to detect nearby coverings based on signal strength, generating and displaying an ordered list of user interface elements for operational control, allowing users to directly interact with and control coverings without needing to move between them, thereby reducing trial and error and overall power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually identify and pair user devices with architectural structure coverings in structures with multiple coverings, then control functionality is achieved, but user interaction becomes difficult and inefficient due to the challenge of determining the target covering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of controlling coveringsVSAvoidcomplexity of identifying target covering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines proximity between the user device and architectural structure coverings using signal strength measurements, eliminating the need for manual pairing or identification. The coverings self-identify their proximity status to the user device, and the system automatically generates the ordered list based on this information, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring active user intervention for pairing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors signal strength between the user device and coverings, providing real-time feedback about proximity. This feedback is used to dynamically generate and update the ordered list of coverings, allowing users to see which coverings are currently nearest and adjust the list accordingly. The feedback loop ensures the control interface remains synchronized with the actual spatial relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If users move back and forth among multiple coverings to identify control pairings, then correct control associations are established, but time is lost and power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of control pairingVSAvoidtime to establish control pairing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and pre-organizes the ordered list of coverings based on their proximity to the user device before the user needs to control them. By determining signal strength and generating the sorted list in advance, the system eliminates the need for users to manually test and identify control pairings during the control process, saving both time and energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of physically moving among coverings to identify pairings with an electronic signal strength-based proximity detection system. Instead of mechanical trial-and-error interaction, the system uses wireless signal measurements to automatically determine spatial relationships and generate the appropriate control interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If users repeatedly signal between user device and coverings to identify correct pairings, then control associations are confirmed, but power consumption increases especially in battery-powered systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfirmation of control pairingVSAvoidpower consumption of user device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically maintains and updates the ordered list of coverings based on continuous proximity monitoring, eliminating the need for users to repeatedly initiate signaling to confirm pairings. The system self-manages the control associations based on signal strength measurements, reducing the frequency and intensity of communication cycles between the user device and coverings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discrete, repeated signaling attempts to confirm pairings, the system implements continuous proximity monitoring that maintains an up-to-date ordered list. This continuous background operation is more energy-efficient than repeated active signaling cycles because it uses lower-power monitoring modes and only triggers full control sequences when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12047905B2Systems and methods for determining proximity of architectural structure coverings
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • US12047905B2 patent drawing
  • US12047905B2 patent drawing
  • US12047905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining proximity of architectural structure coverings. A user device receives a broadcast signal from each of a plurality of architectural structure coverings. An ordered list of the plurality of the architectural structure coverings is then maintained based on the broadcast signal. At least a portion of the ordered list is displayed on a display of the user device.