Aircraft Engine Cowl Door Screw Actuator Without Hydraulics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydraulic actuators used for opening aircraft engine cowl doors face challenges such as decreased performance at cold temperatures, mechanical lock malfunctions, hydraulic oil contamination, and oil leakage, requiring a more reliable, cost-effective, and lightweight solution.

Innovation Solution

An electro-mechanical actuator system comprising a housing, screw shaft, transmission system, nut, piston rod, and lost motion device with a compression coil spring to absorb vibrations and thermal expansion, powered by an electric motor with a torque limiter and manual operation capabilities, eliminating hydraulic components and their associated issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic actuators are used for opening cowl doors, then the actuation function is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to oil leakage, contamination, and mechanical lock malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic oil leakage and contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the hydraulic system entirely from the actuator design, extracting the problematic hydraulic components (oil, seals, pressure relief valves, mechanical locks) and replacing them with a purely mechanical screw-driven system. This elimination of hydraulic elements directly resolves the reliability issues caused by oil leakage and contamination while maintaining the door opening function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the hydraulic mechanical system with a simplified mechanical system based on a screw shaft and nut mechanism. The electric motor drives the screw shaft, which translates rotational motion into linear motion of the piston rod through the nut, eliminating the need for hydraulic fluid and associated components, thereby improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If hydraulic actuators are used, then actuation is achieved, but weight increases due to multiple hydraulic components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator simplicityVSAvoidactuator weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes all heavy hydraulic components (hydraulic oil reservoir, pumps, valves, seals, and mechanical locks) from the actuator design. The resulting lightweight actuator uses only essential mechanical elements (screw shaft, nut, piston rod, and electric motor), significantly reducing overall weight while maintaining functional simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent discards the complex hydraulic system and recovers only the essential mechanical transmission function needed for door actuation. By eliminating unnecessary hydraulic components and retaining only the critical screw-driven linear motion mechanism, the design achieves both weight reduction and simplified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If hydraulic actuators are used, then door opening is achieved, but performance decreases at cold temperatures due to increased oil viscosity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator performanceVSAvoidcold temperature performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic system with a mechanical screw-driven system that is insensitive to temperature variations. The electric motor provides consistent torque across temperature ranges, and the screw-nut mechanism translates this torque into reliable linear motion without being affected by fluid viscosity changes, ensuring consistent performance in cold environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameter from hydraulic fluid flow (which is highly temperature-dependent) to mechanical torque transmission through a screw mechanism. This parameter change eliminates the temperature sensitivity issue, as mechanical friction and torque characteristics remain relatively stable across a wide temperature range, maintaining actuator performance in cold conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If hydraulic actuators are used, then actuation is achieved, but maintenance complexity increases due to multiple components requiring careful design and maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates all maintenance-intensive hydraulic components (seals, pressure relief valves, mechanical locks, and hydraulic circuitry) from the actuator design. The simplified mechanical system with fewer moving parts requires minimal maintenance, improving both durability and ease of repair while maintaining reliable door opening functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent discards the complex hydraulic subsystem and recovers only the essential actuation function through a simplified mechanical screw-driven system. This reduction in component count directly decreases maintenance complexity while enhancing durability, as there are fewer parts that can fail or require servicing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The electro-mechanical actuator system provides reliable, cost-effective, and lightweight operation of aircraft engine cowl doors, improving durability and reducing maintenance complexity by eliminating hydraulic system vulnerabilities and allowing for manual operation without electronic feedback.

Implementation Method 1

a lost motion device coupled to the piston rod and disposed within the hollow interior of the piston rod, the lost motion device comprising a compression coil spring arranged within the hollow interior of the piston rod and between an inwardly extending flange of the piston rod and the rod end, wherein the rod end is slidably mounted in the hollow piston rod, the lost motion device being operable to absorb mechanical vibration of the cowl door

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the lost motion device being operable to absorb mechanical vibration of the cowl door and thermal expansion of the engine casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentEP3480116B1Electro-mechanical actuator systems for opening and closing of aircraft engine cowl doors
Publication Date: 2022.07.13 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • EP3480116B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3480116B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3480116B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system (40) for controlling the movement of an aircraft engine cowl door includes an actuator assembly (26) having a housing (60) and a screw shaft (68) arranged at least partially within a hollow interior of the housing (60). The screw shaft (68) is rotatable about an axis relative to the housing (60). A transmission system is coupled to the screw shaft (68) to impart rotation to the screw shaft (68) about the axis. A nut (80) is engaged with the screw shaft (68) and a piston rod (82) having a rod end mounted thereto connects the nut (80) to the cowl door (24) of the engine. The nut (80) is translatable relative to the screw shaft (68) to transition the cowl door between a first position and a second position.