Cox Regression Risk Assessment for T2DM Complications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk assessment systems for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications lack accuracy in predicting the likelihood and timing of complications such as cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and neuropathy, especially for patients with a history of hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, which hinders effective disease management.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a data acquisition module and risk assessment module to calculate risk values for T2DM complications using a Cox proportional hazards regression model, considering multiple risk factors and 62 different disease progressions, represented by the equation ra(t,i,j)=1−exp{[H(t0)−H(t1)]Ca(t,i,j)}, where ra(t, i, j) is the risk value for developing a complication j from disease i at age t, incorporating parameters like glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, and disease history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional risk assessment methods are used for T2DM complications, then the assessment process is simple, but the prediction accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system segments the complex prediction task into multiple independent risk factors (age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, kidney function, etc.), each evaluated separately through standardized equations. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high prediction accuracy by considering multiple variables while keeping the assessment process structured and manageable through modular calculation components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms clinical risk assessment into quantifiable parameters by converting qualitative disease states into numerical values that can be processed through mathematical equations. Each risk factor is assigned specific parameter ranges and weights, enabling accurate prediction through parameter-based calculations while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized measurement protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple risk factors are considered in risk assessment, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple risk factor assessments into a unified prediction framework where individual risk equations are combined to produce an overall complication risk assessment. The integration of cardiovascular, renal, and other complication risks is achieved through standardized combining rules that maintain calculation simplicity while incorporating comprehensive risk factor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The risk assessment system is designed with universal applicability across different T2DM patient populations and complication types. The same core equations and methodology are used for predicting various complications (cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, etc.), allowing the system to handle multiple functions with a single standardized approach rather than requiring separate complex models for each complication type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive disease history and risk factors are collected, then the assessment accuracy improves, but the data collection burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata collection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for accurate risk assessment by establishing standardized data collection templates and equations in advance. All necessary risk factors and their measurement methods are predetermined and organized into structured formats, allowing healthcare providers to efficiently collect required information during routine patient visits without ad-hoc data gathering, thus reducing the operational burden while maintaining comprehensive data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230046951A1System and method for assessing risk of type 2 mellitus diabetes complications
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY
  • US20230046951A1 patent drawing
  • US20230046951A1 patent drawing
  • US20230046951A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for assessing risks of T2DM complications includes: a data acquisition module obtaining and inputting assessment parameters of a patient with T2DM into a risk assessment module; and the risk assessment module inputting the assessment parameters into a number of risk equations and using it to calculate risk values of the complication occurring after a period of time. The risk equation for all diabetic complications (i,j) is:ra(t,i,j)=1−exp{[H(t0)−H(t1)]Ca(t,i,j)}ra(t, i, j) is the risk value for the patient to develop the complication j from the current disease i at age t. t0 is an age of one patient at a state of the disease i. t1 is an age of the patient after the period of time. t is an age between t0 and t1. H(t0) and H(t1) are hazards of the complication occurring at the age t0 and the age t1, respectively. Ca(t, i, j) is a Cox proportional hazards regression expression, and is represented by:Ca(t,i,j)=exp(Ra(t,i,j))Ra(t, i, j) is an influence degree of risk factors X on the complication j.