Customer Premises Equipment Predictive Care Using ML Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems lack effective predictive mechanisms to anticipate and proactively address conditions in customer premises equipment that could lead to failures or service interruptions, relying instead on reactive measures after problems have already occurred.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning-based approach that utilizes time-based operating statistics and historical customer care data to learn thresholds and define predictive signatures for potential equipment conditions, enabling proactive actions such as reboots, channel switches, or technician dispatches before issues arise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional reactive monitoring is used for customer premises equipment, then operational expenses increase and customer satisfaction decreases, but implementing predictive maintenance requires complex machine learning systems and data processing infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting equipment failures before they occur using machine learning models. The predictive signature analysis identifies potential issues in advance, allowing proactive maintenance actions to be taken before actual failures happen, thus improving reliability without requiring complex real-time intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the equipment to effectively monitor and report its own health status through collected operating statistics. The machine learning system automatically analyzes this self-reported data to generate predictions, reducing the need for complex external monitoring infrastructure while improving equipment reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If predictive signatures with multiple operating statistics are analyzed, then prediction accuracy improves, but data processing requirements and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively analyzing only the most relevant operating statistics for each equipment type and failure mode. Rather than processing all possible data points equally, the machine learning model focuses on key predictive indicators, maintaining high prediction accuracy while reducing computational energy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting which operating statistics are analyzed based on equipment type, historical failure patterns, and current operational context. The machine learning model adapts the set of monitored parameters to optimize the balance between prediction accuracy and computational energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If proactive maintenance actions are initiated based on predictions, then service interruptions are minimized, but false predictions may lead to unnecessary maintenance operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the accuracy of predictive signatures and using this information to refine future predictions. When predictions lead to successful preventive maintenance, this feedback reinforces the model; when false predictions occur, the system learns from these errors to improve future prediction reliability while maintaining service continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by implementing validation checks and confidence threshold assessments before initiating maintenance actions. This preliminary verification step counteracts potential false predictions by filtering out low-confidence alerts, reducing unnecessary maintenance operations while preserving the ability to act on reliable predictions to maintain service continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12619956B2Predictive care of customer premises equipments
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US12619956B2 patent drawing
  • US12619956B2 patent drawing
  • US12619956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various example embodiments for supporting predictive care of customer premises equipments are presented herein. Various example embodiments for supporting predictive care of customer premises equipments may be configured to support machine learning predictive care of customer premises equipments based on application of various machine learning capabilities.