CPR Feedback System for Manual and Automated Chest Compressions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CPR systems lack real-time feedback mechanisms that can differentiate between manual, automated, and mechanically assisted chest compressions, leading to potential inefficiencies and inconsistencies in resuscitative treatments, as existing feedback systems often require manual adjustment and may provide irrelevant or misleading information when used with different compression types.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a processor, motion sensors, and output devices that analyze chest compression waveforms to identify the type of compression (manual, automated, or mechanically assisted ACD) and provide tailored feedback to rescuers, including compression depth and rate feedback, while integrating with defibrillation and physiological sensors for synchronized care.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single feedback system is used for all chest compression types, then the system structure is simple, but the feedback accuracy and reliability deteriorate because the system cannot differentiate between manual, automated, and mechanically assisted compressions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback by using motion sensors to detect compression waveforms and a processor to analyze these waveforms for identification. The processor generates appropriate feedback messages based on the identified compression type, eliminating the need for manual adjustment and ensuring accurate, relevant feedback is provided to rescuers throughout the resuscitation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-identification of compression types by automatically analyzing waveform features without requiring manual input or configuration. The processor autonomously detects whether compressions are manual, automated, or mechanically assisted by examining characteristics such as compression rate variability, depth consistency, and waveform shape, then selectively provides appropriate feedback without rescuer intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual adjustment is required for different compression types, then the system can be simple, but the response time and productivity worsen due to delays in adjusting feedback parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresuscitation efficiencyVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-programs multiple feedback modes corresponding to different compression types (manual, automated, mechanically assisted). The processor continuously monitors compression waveforms and automatically switches between pre-configured feedback modes based on real-time waveform analysis, eliminating the need for manual adjustment during resuscitation and ensuring immediate appropriate feedback is provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts feedback parameters in real-time based on the identified compression type. The processor continuously analyzes waveform features and automatically adjusts feedback content, such as providing compression rate feedback for manual compressions while withholding it for automated compressions, ensuring the feedback system remains optimized for the current compression method without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If feedback is provided for all compression types, then the information completeness is high, but the information relevance deteriorates because some feedback may be misleading or irrelevant for certain compression types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation relevanceVSAvoidwaveform analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides differentiated feedback tailored to each compression type by analyzing local waveform characteristics. For manual compressions, the system provides compression rate and depth feedback. For automated compressions, it withholds rate feedback but may provide depth feedback. For mechanically assisted ACD compressions, it provides specific feedback relevant to the active compression-decompression mechanism, ensuring each rescuer receives only the information relevant to their specific compression method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The processor changes feedback parameters based on identified compression types by analyzing waveform features such as compression rate variability, depth consistency, and temporal patterns. The system adjusts which parameters are monitored and fed back—for example, emphasizing rate variability for manual compressions while monitoring depth consistency for automated compressions—ensuring the most relevant information is provided for each compression methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the effectiveness of CPR by providing accurate, real-time feedback that improves the quality of chest compressions and synchronizes defibrillation shocks with compression cycles, ensuring consistent and efficient resuscitative care across varying compression methods.

Implementation Method 1

at least one motion sensor, communicatively coupled to the processor and configured to generate signals indicative of motion of the chest of the victim during chest compressions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMotion detection:

Data Source

PatentUS20240221539A1Automated Detection of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Chest Compressions
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
  • US20240221539A1 patent drawing
  • US20240221539A1 patent drawing
  • US20240221539A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example of a system for assisting a rescuer in providing CPR includes a motion sensor configured to generate signals indicative of chest motion during CPR chest compressions, and a defibrillator including a display screen configured to provide CPR feedback and defibrillation information and a processor configured to receive the signals, generate a compression waveform based on the signals, detect, in the compression waveform, features characteristic of chest compressions, compare the detected features to a predetermined criterion that distinguishes between manually delivered and compressions delivered by an automated compression device, and selectively provide the CPR feedback based on whether the compressions are the manually delivered or the automated compressions, where the selective provision of the CPR feedback includes displaying CPR parameters for the manually delivered compressions, and a removing from the display screen at least one CPR parameter of the CPR parameters for the automated compressions.