CPR Compression System with Periodic Patient Check Pauses
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be ineffective due to rescuer fatigue and inability to maintain proper compression frequency, depth, and release, leading to inadequate blood circulation and potential organ damage.
Innovation Solution
A CPR chest compression system that includes a retention structure to hold the patient, a compression mechanism to perform automatic CPR compressions, and a user interface that outputs human-perceptible prompts to alert the rescuer to check the patient during pauses in compressions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual CPR is performed continuously, then blood circulation is maintained, but rescuer fatigue increases and compression quality degrades
Solution Approach 1:
The CPR system performs self-monitoring of compression parameters (depth, rate, recovery phase) and automatically provides feedback to the rescuer, eliminating the need for continuous manual monitoring while maintaining high compression quality throughout the procedure
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms that monitor compression depth, rate, and recovery phase, providing audible or visual cues to the rescuer to maintain proper technique, thereby preventing fatigue-related degradation in compression quality
2Productivity
If CPR compressions are performed at high frequency, then blood circulation is improved, but rescuer ability to check patient condition deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements periodic pauses in compression at predetermined intervals (e.g., every 2 minutes) to allow the rescuer to check patient condition, while maintaining high compression frequency during active CPR cycles. This periodic interruption ensures both effective circulation and periodic patient assessment
3Reliability
If automated CPR system is used, then compression consistency is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system replaces manual mechanical compression with an automated mechanical compression device that uses a piston or plunger mechanism driven by a motor, ensuring consistent compression depth and rate while reducing the physical burden on the rescuer. The automation is achieved through mechanical or electronic actuation systems
4Productivity
If compression depth is increased, then blood circulation is improved, but risk of rib fracture increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system incorporates sensors that monitor compression depth in real-time and provide feedback to the rescuer or control system, ensuring that compression depth remains within the optimal range (at least 2 inches or 5 cm for adults) to achieve effective blood circulation while avoiding excessive depth that could cause rib fractures
Solution Approach 2:
The system allows adjustment of compression parameters (depth, rate, force) based on patient characteristics and response, optimizing the balance between achieving adequate blood circulation and avoiding excessive compression that could cause skeletal injury
Data Source
AI summary
In embodiments, a CPR chest compression system includes a retention structure that can retain the patient's body, and a compression mechanism that can perform automatically CPR compressions and releases to the patient's chest. The compression mechanism can pause the performing of the CPR compressions for a short time, so that an attendant can check the patient. The CPR system also includes a user interface that can output a human-perceptible check patient prompt, to alert an attendant to check the patient during the pause. An advantage can be when the attendant checks in situations where the condition of the patient might have changed, and an adjustment is needed. Or in situations where the patient may have improved enough to where the compressions are no longer needed.


