Control Plane Triggered Optical Protection Switching for Automatic Path Reversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Optical Protection Switching (OPS) systems fail to ensure automatic switching to preferred paths after faults are cleared, often reverting to non-preferred restoration paths and requiring manual administrator intervention, which is time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Control Plane Triggered (CPT) OPS policy that operates at a lower priority level than Sub-Network Connection Protection (SNCP) protocols, allowing for automatic switching back to home paths after faults are cleared, using Layer 0 Control Plane (L0CP) diagnostics to verify path status and trigger OPS switching actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional OPS systems are used for automatic protection switching, then fault protection is provided, but automatic switching back to preferred home paths after faults are cleared does not occur, requiring manual administrator intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic switching back to home pathVSAvoidtime for manual intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors fault status and automatically triggers OPS switching actions. When faults are cleared, the system detects this change and autonomously switches traffic back to the preferred home path without requiring manual administrator intervention, thereby resolving the contradiction between automation extent and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting fault clearance conditions and executing the switching back to home path operations independently. This eliminates the need for manual administrator intervention and reduces the time loss associated with manual operations, while maintaining proper fault protection through the OPS mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple routing policies are implemented with different priority levels, then optimized path selection is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath selection optimizationVSAvoidrouting policy management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the routing policy into distinct priority levels, with CPT-OPS operating at a lower priority level than SNCP protocols. This segmentation allows each policy to operate independently with clearly defined roles, achieving optimized path selection while managing complexity through structured hierarchy rather than monolithic policy management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring the priority hierarchy between different routing policies before operation. The CPT-OPS policy is established to operate at a lower priority level than SNCP protocols in advance, allowing automatic optimized path selection without requiring complex real-time decision-making, thus reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11967984B2Control plane triggered (CPT) optical protection switching (OPS)
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 CIENA CORP
  • US11967984B2 patent drawing
  • US11967984B2 patent drawing
  • US11967984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for performing a Control Plane Triggered (CPT) Optical Protection Switching (OPS) policy are provided. A method, according to one implementation, includes performing a first route switching procedure for switching routes between an originating node and a terminating node. The first route switching procedure is configured to operate at a first priority level according to an Optical Protection Switching (OPS) policy. The method also includes performing a second route switching procedure for switching routes between the originating node and the terminating node. The second route switching procedure is configured to operate at a second priority level according to a second protection policy, wherein the second priority level is higher than the first priority level. Also, the method includes reverting back to a home path according to the first route switching procedure after one or more faults, defects, or degradations have been cleared from the home path.