CPU Allocation for Container Power Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container management systems fail to optimize CPU allocation and configuration for efficient power consumption and performance, particularly in environments with limited computational resources or high loads.

Innovation Solution

A method for allocating CPUs into dedicated, shared, and isolated states, using an orchestrator agent to bind CPUs to specific containers, and configuring power states to minimize power consumption while ensuring performance, including generating power profiles for application pools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CPUs are allocated to containers with full isolation and dedicated power states, then performance and reliability are improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer execution reliabilityVSAvoidCPU power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments CPUs into different categories (dedicated CPUs, shared CPUs, and isolated CPUs) with different power states. This segmentation allows the system to allocate full isolation and dedicated power states only to specific containers that require them, while other containers can share CPUs in lower power states, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining reliability for critical containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different power state configurations to different CPU allocations based on local container requirements. Critical containers receive full isolation with dedicated power states for maximum reliability, while non-critical containers share CPUs in lower power states. This local quality approach ensures each container receives the appropriate level of power state isolation needed for its specific execution requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Use of energy by moving object

If CPUs are shared among multiple containers to reduce power consumption, then power efficiency improves, but performance and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCPU power consumptionVSAvoidcontainer execution performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments CPU allocation into multiple categories including shared CPUs and isolated CPUs. Containers can be assigned to shared CPU pools where multiple containers share a CPU in lower power states, or to isolated CPU pools where containers receive dedicated CPU access. This segmentation allows the system to optimize for power efficiency in shared pools while maintaining performance in isolated pools, resolving the contradiction between power efficiency and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic CPU allocation where containers can migrate between different CPU power states and isolation levels based on workload demands. When performance is needed, containers can be moved to higher power states or isolated CPUs; when power savings are prioritized, containers can be moved to shared lower power states. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to adapt to changing performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If full CPU isolation is implemented for all containers, then stability and security are improved, but device complexity and resource utilization worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer execution stabilityVSAvoidCPU allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments CPU isolation into different levels: dedicated CPUs with full isolation, shared CPUs with partial isolation, and isolated CPUs with controlled sharing. This segmentation reduces device complexity by providing a hierarchical isolation model where not all containers require the maximum isolation level, thereby simplifying the overall allocation complexity while maintaining stability for containers that need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal CPU allocation framework that can accommodate multiple isolation levels and power states within a single system. The CPU manager can allocate CPUs in different modes (dedicated, shared, isolated) based on container requirements, providing multi-functionality that reduces complexity compared to implementing separate isolated systems for each container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If dedicated CPUs are allocated to each container, then performance is improved, but resource utilization and power efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer execution speedVSAvoidCPU energy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments CPU allocation into dedicated CPUs for performance-critical containers and shared CPUs for less demanding containers. This segmentation allows the system to concentrate dedicated CPU resources only where performance is essential, while using shared CPUs in lower power states for other containers, thereby reducing overall energy waste while maintaining high performance where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power state parameter of CPUs dynamically based on allocation mode. Dedicated CPUs operate in higher power states optimized for performance, while shared CPUs operate in lower power states when serving multiple containers. This parameter change approach allows the system to optimize performance for dedicated allocations while minimizing energy consumption for shared allocations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250258533A1Power Consumption Management Using CPU Allocation and Configuration
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 RAKUTEN SYMPHONY INC
  • US20250258533A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258533A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258533A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Applications are executed on a host in association with a power profile and a pool of one or more CPUs that are isolated relative to the applications. The power profile includes a lowest power state that is suitable for the applications and achieves required performance for the workload being performed by the applications. The applications may have fractional CPU requirements collectively met by the number of CPUs in the pool. Other components, such as the operating system and one or more agents of one or more orchestrators may be allocated their own isolated pool of CPUs operating at a highest power state. The implementation of isolated CPUs that are shared by multiple applications may be performed by an agent of an orchestrator that is called as the CRI when instantiating containers.