CPU Resource Restriction for Legacy App Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern computer systems face challenges in achieving backward compatibility when executing legacy applications due to differences in performance characteristics between new and legacy CPUs, leading to errors in real-time operations, whether the new device is less or more performant than the legacy device.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a backwards compatibility mode that restricts certain CPU resources, disables features not present on legacy CPUs, alters instruction execution latency, and modifies algorithmic details to match legacy CPU behavior, thereby reducing errors by aligning the new CPU's performance with that of the legacy CPU.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the new device uses a more advanced CPU with higher performance, then processing power and computational capability are improved, but backward compatibility with legacy applications deteriorates due to performance differences

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCPU processing powerVSAvoidbackward compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic mode switching mechanism that allows the CPU to operate in different performance modes. When executing legacy applications, the system automatically switches to a compatibility mode that emulates the original CPU architecture's performance characteristics. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by enabling the system to adapt its performance level based on the application type, thus maintaining both high performance for new applications and reliability for legacy ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes critical CPU parameters including instruction execution latency, pipeline depth, cache hierarchy, and execution unit availability when entering compatibility mode. By adjusting these parameters to match the legacy CPU architecture, the system achieves backward compatibility while maintaining the ability to provide enhanced performance when needed for modern applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the new device executes legacy applications at native speed, then execution time is reduced, but errors occur due to untested high-speed operation consequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication execution timeVSAvoidapplication execution correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the execution speed and timing characteristics of legacy applications based on the detected CPU architecture. When running on a more advanced CPU, the system slows down the execution timing to match the original hardware's temporal characteristics, preventing race conditions and timing-related errors while maintaining acceptable execution time through optimized scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by pre-configuring the CPU to emulate legacy timing characteristics before executing legacy applications. This includes pre-establishing appropriate instruction latency, memory access timing, and synchronization mechanisms that prevent high-speed operation errors from occurring in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If the new device restricts CPU resources to match legacy performance, then backward compatibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackward compatibilityVSAvoidCPU mode management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal CPU core design that can function in multiple architectures through software-controlled resource restriction. Instead of requiring separate hardware for different CPU generations, the same physical CPU can be configured to emulate legacy architectures by selectively disabling or restricting certain execution units, caches, and pipelines, thereby achieving multi-functionality without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer in the form of a compatibility manager or emulator that mediates between the advanced CPU hardware and legacy applications. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of resource restriction, mode switching, and architecture emulation, shielding the user and application from the underlying hardware complexity while maintaining backward compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11853763B2Backward compatibility by restriction of hardware resources
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
  • US11853763B2 patent drawing
  • US11853763B2 patent drawing
  • US11853763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new device executing an application on a new central processing unit (CPU), determines whether the application is for a legacy device having a legacy CPU. When the new device determines that the application is for the legacy device, it executes the application on the new CPU with selected available resources of the new device restricted to approximate or match a processing behavior of the legacy CPU, e.g., by reducing a usable portion of a return address stack of the new CPU and thereby reducing a number of calls and associated returns that can be tracked.