Child Resistant Closure Guard Deflection Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child-resistant closure mechanisms for containers have a large profile, which is undesirable for certain applications, and combining seal and closure mechanisms can compromise their effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A container design with a child-resistant closure that includes a resilient guard with a small profile, independent of the seal mechanism, allowing for easy opening by applying inward radial pressure to deflect the guard and expose the underside of the cap's front tab, while maintaining a moisture-tight seal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the profile of the guard is reduced to allow for more convenient storage, then the outer-most surface of the guard is about 2 mm to 4 mm from the container body, but the functionality of the child resistant closure may be adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofile of guardVSAvoidchild resistant closure functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the geometric dimensions of the guard while maintaining its protective function. The guard's outer-most surface is positioned at about 2 mm to 4 mm from the container body, representing a specific parameter optimization that reduces profile while preserving child resistant closure functionality through carefully controlled dimensional relationships between guard components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the seal and closure mechanism are combined in a single structure, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the integrity of both the seal and closure mechanism may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal and closure mechanism integrationVSAvoidseal and closure mechanism integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the sealing and closure functions into separate, independent structures. The seal is formed between the container body and cap, while the closure mechanism operates independently through the guard structure. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other, maintaining both manufacturing simplicity and functional integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides effective child-resistant closure functionality with a small profile guard and independent seal and closure mechanisms, ensuring the container remains secure without compromising the seal's integrity.

Implementation Method 1

A child resistant closure configured to impede opening of the container when in an engaged position. The child resistant closure includes a resilient guard configured to deflect inward radially when inward radial pressure is applied to it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10322856B2Container having a child resistant closure with a small profile
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 CSP TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10322856B2 patent drawing
  • US10322856B2 patent drawing
  • US10322856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods for opening containers having child resistant closures. The methods include applying inward radial pressure on a resilient guard of a container to deflect the guard inwardly, followed by applying upward pressure to an exposed front tab of a cap of the container to open the cap.