Rotary Tower Crane Controller Dynamic Load Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cranes face limitations in load capacity and stability, particularly during fast movements and high loads, as they rely solely on load and radius monitoring, neglecting dynamic values like movement speed and acceleration, which can lead to instability and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a crane controller with multiple load limits and actuation modes that allow individual actuation of drive devices in extended load capacity ranges, where simultaneous actuation is restricted to reduced speeds and accelerations, and introducing a pause between drive device activations to manage dynamic loads and enhance stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the crane allows simultaneous actuation of multiple drive devices to enable fast crane or load movements, then the productivity and speed of operation are improved, but the dynamic loads increase and the stability and safety of the crane deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of crane operationsVSAvoidstability and safety of the crane
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The crane control system dynamically adjusts operational parameters based on real-time conditions. The monitoring device continuously tracks load, radius, speed, and acceleration, and the control system automatically modifies permissible operations to maintain stability while maximizing productivity when conditions allow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (speed limits, acceleration limits, simultaneous actuation permissions) based on the current load and radius conditions. When load and radius are low, the system permits faster movements and simultaneous drive actuation. When load or radius increase, the system restricts these parameters to maintain stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the crane reduces travel speeds and acceleration to maintain stability under high loads, then the stability and safety are improved, but the productivity and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of the craneVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts speed and acceleration limits based on real-time monitoring of load and radius. Rather than maintaining constant reduced speeds, the system permits maximum speeds when conditions allow and only reduces speeds when necessary to maintain stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring device continuously monitors crane parameters and periodically adjusts operational permissions. The system alternates between permitting normal operations and imposing restrictions based on whether current conditions exceed stability thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Quantity of substance

If the crane defines two different load limits with reduced speeds and acceleration for extended load capacity, then the load capacity is improved, but the device complexity and control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacity of the craneVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring device and control system serve multiple functions: they monitor load and radius, determine current operational mode, enforce appropriate speed and acceleration limits, and manage permissions for simultaneous drive actuation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes (switching between normal and extended load modes) to manage complexity. Rather than implementing completely separate control systems for different load capacities, the system modifies operational parameters (speed limits, acceleration limits, simultaneous actuation permissions) based on the current mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If the crane allows individual actuation of drive devices in extended load capacity range to further increase load capacity, then the load capacity is improved, but the ease of operation and operational flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacity of the craneVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system permits partial actuation of drive devices based on current conditions. Rather than completely restricting simultaneous actuation in extended load mode, the system evaluates each drive device activation request and permits it if the resulting dynamic loads remain within stability thresholds, providing partial operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2847121B1crane
Publication Date: 2015.10.21 LIEBHERR WERK BIBERACH GMBH
  • EP2847121B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2847121B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a crane, in particular a rotary tower crane, having drive devices (9-15) for crane and/or load movements in/around multiple movement axes, and having a crane control system (16) for driving the drive devices, wherein the crane control system has a monitoring device (17) for monitoring the crane loading and restricting crane movements when load limits are reached. The monitoring device has at least two load limits (LM1, LM2, LM3), between which the drive devices can only be actuated individually.