Crane Load Estimation via Machine-Specific Statistical Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the load on working machines, especially dynamic machines like cranes, are prone to interference from external influences and inaccuracies due to factors like rope deflection and weight, and often require costly or impractical sensor installations, particularly in harsh environments.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-phase process: a calibration phase where a machine-specific load model is developed using operational sequences and statistical analysis of available machine parameters, and an application phase where this model estimates load without prior knowledge of physics, utilizing existing sensors and potentially external sensors to account for environmental influences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If direct force measurement sensors are installed at the load capture point, then load measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine parameters (acceleration, velocity, position from sensors already present on the machine) as intermediary variables to indirectly determine load, avoiding direct installation of force measurement sensors at the load capture point. The load model acts as a mediator that translates these intermediate parameters into load information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical force measurement system (direct force sensors) with a computational model-based system that uses acceleration, velocity, and position data processed through a load model to determine load, thereby eliminating the need for complex direct force sensing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If load measurement is performed in harsh environments with dynamic machines, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to external influences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine operation continuityVSAvoidload measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the load model continuously receives updated machine parameters (acceleration, velocity, position) and adjusts load determination accordingly. This allows the system to compensate for changing environmental conditions and maintain measurement accuracy during dynamic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration to determine machine-specific parameters and characteristics before actual load measurement begins. This preliminary action creates a customized load model that accounts for the specific machine's behavior, making subsequent measurements more accurate even in harsh environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If rope length compensation and filtering algorithms are used to improve load measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload measurement accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from correcting measured values through complex filtering to directly calculating load using fundamental physics parameters (acceleration, velocity, position) and a simplified load model, reducing computational complexity while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If existing sensors are used for load determination, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision may deteriorate due to sensor limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system simplicityVSAvoidload estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calibration using the existing sensors to determine machine-specific parameters and create a customized load model. This preliminary action compensates for sensor limitations and improves the accuracy of load estimation without requiring additional or more precise sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2947035B1Method for determining the load on a working machine and working machine, in particular a crane
Publication Date: 2021.07.14 LIEBHERR WERK NENZING
  • EP2947035B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2947035B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2947035B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining the load absorbed by a machine for dynamic material handling, in particular a crane, wherein the load is determined during operation by means of a load model, the load model being determined during a calibration phase of the machine as follows: - execution of a plurality of standard machine operations with a recorded reference load while available machine parameters are recorded, - performance of a significance analysis of the recorded parameters to identify statistically significant parameters that show a dependence on the load, - execution of a statistical learning and/or optimization algorithm to create a machine-specific load model that describes the relationship between the parameters identified as significant and the load.