Cranial Clamp Fixation for Poor Bone Quality Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal fixation systems are inadequate for patients with poor bone quality or bone defects, as they lack sufficient surface area for anchorage and are unsuitable for conditions like Chiari malformation, where bone defects and limited bone availability hinder effective stabilization of the craniospinal junction.

Innovation Solution

A cranial attachment device with a clamp system that includes a first member for the upper cranial bone, a second member for the lower cranial bone, and a third member for the cranial edge, along with a fastener to anchor a spinal stabilization rod, allowing for secure fixation and stabilization even in cases of poor bone quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If conventional spinal fixation systems are used, then the procedure can be performed with standard equipment, but the systems lack sufficient surface area for anchorage and are inadequate for patients with poor bone quality or bone defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface area for anchorageVSAvoideffectiveness of stabilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fixation system is divided into multiple separate components: a cranial attachment device with multiple engagement members, a rod member, and a vertebral attachment device. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for specific anchorage requirements, enabling sufficient surface area contact even in patients with poor bone quality or bone defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from conventional single-plane fixation to a multi-dimensional approach by engaging bone structures at multiple spatial levels - the cranial attachment device engages the skull base, the rod provides intermediate support, and the vertebral attachment device engages the vertebrae. This multi-dimensional engagement creates sufficient anchorage surface area regardless of bone quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If extensive surgical correction is performed to stabilize the craniocervical junction, then stabilization can be achieved, but the surgical complexity and morbidity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization of craniocervical junctionVSAvoidsurgical procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical procedure is segmented into distinct stages: first the cranial attachment device is secured to the skull base, then the rod member is positioned and secured to the vertebrae, with the vertebral attachment device providing final stabilization. This segmentation allows for a more controlled, less complex surgical approach compared to traditional single-stage extensive correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rod member acts as an intermediary element connecting the cranial attachment device and the vertebral attachment device. This intermediary component simplifies the overall surgical procedure by providing a straightforward mechanical connection between the cranial and vertebral structures, reducing the complexity of direct extensive correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional fixation devices are used in patients with limited bone availability, then the procedure can be performed, but the devices cannot be effectively anchored due to inadequate bone surface area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuitability for poor bone quality patientsVSAvoidanchorage strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fixation system applies local quality by concentrating anchorage engagement at specific optimal locations on the cranial bone and vertebral structures. The cranial attachment device engages at the skull base while the vertebral attachment device engages at the vertebrae, creating localized high-strength anchorage points that compensate for limited overall bone surface area available for fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fixation system employs composite construction combining different materials with complementary properties - the cranial attachment device and vertebral attachment device are secured to bone structures, while the rod member provides intermediate mechanical support. This composite approach creates a multi-material fixation system that achieves sufficient anchorage strength in patients with limited bone availability by utilizing the strength characteristics of each material and its optimal engagement location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8182511B2Craniospinal fusion method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.05.22 LIFE SPINE INC
  • US8182511B2 patent drawing
  • US8182511B2 patent drawing
  • US8182511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal stabilization system that may be used to fix craniocervical junction. The system includes a cranial spinal attachment system that anchors one or more surgical instruments to a cranial surface using at least one cranial clamp and cranial fastener. The cranial spinal attachment system may be positioned along a perimeter of a cranial defect.