Cranial Protection Apparatus With Interlocking Ridge System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helmets lack effective mechanisms to absorb and dissipate blunt force impacts while also failing to quickly reconstitute their shape after deformation, and they do not offer adjustable rigidity for enhanced user safety.

Innovation Solution

A three-panel outer shell with an interlocking ridge system and a ripcord mechanism for deformation and reconstitution, combined with a spring mechanism for adjustable rigidity, along with additional layers such as gel-filled tubes and memory foam for impact absorption, and a skeletal framing for structural support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional helmets use a simple single-layer shell design, then the device complexity is low, but the ability to absorb and dissipate blunt force impacts is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact absorption capabilityVSAvoidshell structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The outer shell is divided into three separate panels (front panel, rear panel, and side panel) that can independently deform during impact. Each panel contains its own interlocking ridge system, allowing localized deformation and energy absorption while maintaining overall structural integrity. This segmentation enables complex impact absorption behavior without requiring an overly complex overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The helmet employs a composite structure combining rigid outer shell material with integrated interlocking ridge systems made of contrasting materials (such as rubber or viscoelastic polymers). This composite approach allows the shell to provide structural strength while the ridge materials provide impact absorption and energy dissipation, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the outer shell is made rigid to provide protection, then the strength is improved, but the ability to quickly reconstitute shape after deformation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective strengthVSAvoidreconstitution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The interlocking ridge system introduces dynamic characteristics to the otherwise rigid shell. During impact, the ridges deform flexibly to absorb energy, then automatically return to their original positions due to the elastic properties of the ridge material. This dynamic behavior allows the shell to maintain rigidity for protection while enabling rapid shape recovery after deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ridge system changes the effective stiffness parameter of the shell locally. The ridges are designed with specific geometric parameters (height, spacing, cross-section) that allow them to be flexible during deformation but maintain rigidity in the undeformed state. This parameter optimization enables both strong protection and quick reconstitution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the helmet structure is fixed with constant rigidity, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the adaptability to different impact conditions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to impact conditionsVSAvoidstructural precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the shell into three panels with independent ridge systems, each panel can adapt to different impact conditions locally. The segmentation allows the helmet to provide optimized protection for various impact scenarios (frontal, rear, lateral) without requiring a completely different design for each case, maintaining manufacturing precision while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking ridge system provides different mechanical properties at different locations and deformation stages. During normal use, the ridges maintain a fixed geometric configuration for structural precision. During impact, the local deformation of ridges provides adaptive energy absorption. This local quality variation enables both manufacturing precision and impact adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of energy

If the outer shell deforms significantly to absorb impact energy, then the impact absorption is improved, but the structural stability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The three-panel design with independent ridge systems allows impact energy to be absorbed locally in each panel rather than requiring the entire shell to deform. This segmentation maintains structural stability of the overall helmet while enabling significant energy absorption through localized ridge deformation. Each panel acts as an independent energy absorption unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking ridge system is pre-configured with geometric features (ridges, grooves, stoppers) that provide controlled deformation paths before impact occurs. This beforehand design ensures that during impact, the ridges deform in a predetermined manner that absorbs energy while maintaining structural stability through the stopper mechanisms that prevent excessive deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced protection by effectively absorbing and dissipating impact forces, allowing the helmet to quickly reconstitute its shape and adjust rigidity, thereby improving user safety across various applications.

Implementation Method 1

the interlocking ridge system including a plurality of ridges configured to provide resistance on the outer shells during impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the three-panel outer shell is configured to deform and reconstitute its shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

a spring mechanism configured to adjust the rigidity of the apparatus, wherein the spring mechanism includes a plurality of pins and a plurality of spring loaded slots

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

a compound layer consisting of a gel filled tube layer inserted on top of a memory foam padding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12048343B2Cranial protection apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 MALHEIRO JOHN
  • US12048343B2 patent drawing
  • US12048343B2 patent drawing
  • US12048343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved cranial protection apparatus is provided. The apparatus comprising a three-panel outer shell having an interlocking ridge system, wherein the three-panel outer shell includes a center shell and a pair of wing shells. The interlocking ridge system including a plurality of ridges configured to provide resistance on the outer shells during impact. The three-panel outer shell is configured to deform and reconstitute its shape via various mechanisms. A stopper is provided to limit the amount of deformation.