Crank Handle Assembly Segmentation and Composite Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crank designs for trailers and hopper doors are inefficient due to the tendency of metal handles to catch and rust, making the rotational process labor-intensive and difficult.

Innovation Solution

A crank handle assembly featuring an aluminum elongated extension member with a Delrin rotatable handle member and snap rings, which can be retrofitted or used on new cranks, ensuring smooth operation by preventing rust and allowing free rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal collar and metal handle are crimped together, then structural strength is improved, but the handle portion does not spin freely and catches during rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidrotation smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly is divided into separate components: a collar portion that attaches to the crank shaft, and a handle portion that rotates independently. This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function - the collar provides structural connection while the handle portion provides smooth rotation without catching on other components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If metal handle is used, then durability is improved, but rust occurs making the process labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly uses composite material construction with a metal collar portion for structural strength and attachment, combined with a handle portion made of non-metallic or corrosion-resistant material. This composite approach maintains durability while preventing rust, ensuring the handle can be operated easily without corrosion-related friction or failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If existing crank design is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but the rotational process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The crank handle is segmented into a collar portion and handle portion that can be assembled separately onto the crank shaft. This segmentation allows for simple manufacturing of individual components while enabling smooth rotation during operation, thereby improving operational efficiency without significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8032999B2Method for improving operation of crank assembly
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 HERD BRIAN H
  • US8032999B2 patent drawing
  • US8032999B2 patent drawing
  • US8032999B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In combination with a crank assembly, the improvement comprising an apparatus for improving operation of the crank assembly. The apparatus includes an elongated extension member having each of a predetermined shape, a first predetermined length and formed of a first predetermined material, such predetermined shape includes a projection on one end thereof for engagement with one end of the crank assembly. A rotatable handle member is disposed around at least a portion of the elongated extension member, such rotatable handle member having a second predetermined length and formed of a second predetermined material. There is a means for securing the rotatable handle member to the elongated handle member.