Crash Beam Support Structure for Dual-Speed Impact Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crash beams in vehicles require global reinforcement to enhance crash performance, leading to increased manufacturing costs without ideal crash effects in both low-speed and high-speed crashes.

Innovation Solution

A crash beam design featuring a beam support with perpendicular first and second parts connected to the crash beam body and box, incorporating a weakening cut and optional reinforcing ribs, allowing localized strengthening and improved energy absorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the crash beam is reinforced globally to enhance crash performance, then the crash performance is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding a beam support structure specifically at the connecting part between the crash beam body and crash box, rather than reinforcing the entire crash beam globally. This localized reinforcement targets the critical stress concentration area, improving crash performance where needed most while avoiding unnecessary material and cost increases in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The beam support is divided into a first part connected to the crash box and a second part connected to the crash beam body, with the parts being perpendicular to each other. This segmentation allows the reinforcement structure to adapt to the complex stress distribution at the connecting part, providing effective support while using less material than a solid global reinforcement would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the crash beam is reinforced globally to ensure excellent crash performance, then the crash performance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash performanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By concentrating the reinforcement at the specific location of the connecting part rather than throughout the entire structure, the patent improves crash performance with minimal additional structural complexity. The beam support is a simple L-shaped component that integrates easily into the existing crash beam structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding complex reinforcement throughout the entire crash beam structure, the patent inverts the approach by adding a simple localized support element at the critical connecting part. This inverted thinking - focusing on the specific weak point rather than the whole structure - achieves better crash performance with less complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentEP4294678B1Crash beam and vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.07.02 STELLANTIS AUTO SAS
  • EP4294678B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4294678B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present application provides a crash beam and a vehicle. The crash beam comprises: a crash beam body (11), extending along a width direction of a vehicle; a crash box (21), formed by extending inwardly along a longitudinal direction of the vehicle at both ends of the crash beam body (11) and approximately perpendicular to the crash beam body (11); and a beam support (30), disposed below a connecting part between the crash beam body (11) and the crash box (21) and comprising a first part and a second part perpendicular to each other, wherein the first part and the second part have ends connected to the crash box (21) and the crash beam body (11) respectively, and another ends connected to each other. With the crash beam according to the present application, the crash performance can be improved in both low-speed and high-speed crashes, and the crash beam does not need to be globally reinforced, so that the manufacturing cost can be saved while ensuring safety.