Vehicle Crash Box with Deformable Elongate Members

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy-absorbing materials for crash boxes in vehicles are expensive, heavy, and have longevity issues, limiting their effectiveness in absorbing impact energy and protecting occupants during collisions.

Innovation Solution

A crash box design featuring deformable elongate members of variable lengths and thicknesses, made from high ductile and high-strength materials, with enhanced strength and ductility properties through chemical and physical processes, and a container with specific cross-sectional shapes and fastening plates for controlled energy absorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional energy-absorbing materials are used in crash boxes, then impact energy absorption capability is improved, but vehicle weight increases and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using high-strength steel (with yield strength ≥600 MPa and elongation ≥20%) instead of traditional energy-absorbing materials. This parameter change allows the crash box to achieve excellent energy absorption capability while significantly reducing material density and vehicle weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite structural design by combining high-strength steel material properties with an optimized geometric configuration (container with deformable elongate members). This composite approach integrates material strength with structural efficiency to achieve superior energy absorption per unit weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If traditional energy-absorbing materials are used in crash boxes, then impact energy absorption capability is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using high-strength steel (with yield strength ≥600 MPa and elongation ≥20%) instead of traditional energy-absorbing materials. This parameter change allows the crash box to achieve excellent energy absorption capability while significantly reducing material density and vehicle weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adopts a design philosophy where the crash box is optimized to be replaced after impact events. By using high-strength steel with predictable deformation characteristics, the system provides cost-effective protection without requiring expensive, long-lasting materials that maintain performance after deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Strength

If high-strength materials are used to enhance container strength, then energy absorption capability is improved, but material ductility may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer strengthVSAvoidmaterial ductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully selects high-strength steel materials that meet specific parameter thresholds: yield strength ≥600 MPa and elongation ≥20%. This parameter specification ensures that the material maintains both high strength for energy absorption and sufficient ductility for controlled deformation without brittle failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality enhancement through chemical and physical processes to specific regions of the container and deformable members. These localized treatments optimize material properties where needed while preserving overall ductility and energy absorption characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively absorbs impact energy, reducing the transmission of force to the vehicle cabin and passengers, while minimizing weight and maintaining structural integrity, thereby lowering the risk of injury and enhancing the vehicle's passive safety system.

Implementation Method 1

the crash box collapses and absorbs impact first, prior to other structural components in the vehicle absorbing the impact. In effect, the crash box converts the impact energy of the collision into deformation work

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The strength and ductility properties of the container are enhanced by at least one of a chemical process and a physical process. At least one of a chemical process and physical process may include at least one of a mechanical treatment, laser sintering, a temperature treatment, a pH changing treatment, solvent swelling, a magnetic technique, the application of an electric current, light and a chemical oxidation technique.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical oxidation technique: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS11052848B2Energy absorbing device
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US11052848B2 patent drawing
  • US11052848B2 patent drawing
  • US11052848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy absorbing device includes a deformable elongate member that is arranged such that the device, in use, deforms in a controlled manner upon the absorption of impact energy. The invention also provides a chassis and a vehicle incorporating the energy absorbing device.