Vehicle Crash Box Structure for Controlled Deformation Under High Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle crash boxes do not provide sufficient control over deformation while maintaining resistance to high loads during collisions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle crash box design featuring a tubular member with longitudinally extending walls, where the transverse extensions of the lateral sides decrease away from the interface, providing controlled deformation and resistance to high loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the tubular member is designed with uniform lateral walls to maintain sufficient resistance to high loads, then strength is improved, but deformation control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to high loadsVSAvoiddeformation control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The lateral wall is designed with varying thickness along its longitudinal extension, creating different local properties: the first lateral side portion has a first thickness and the second lateral side portion has a second thickness that is different from the first. This allows the wall to provide sufficient strength where needed while enabling controlled deformation in specific regions during collision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The lateral wall is segmented into multiple lateral side portions (first lateral side portion and second lateral side portion) with different thicknesses. This segmentation allows each portion to serve different functions: one portion resists high loads while another portion controls deformation, resolving the contradiction between strength and deformation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If the tubular member is designed with varying wall thickness to control deformation, then deformation control is improved, but structural simplicity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation controlVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using completely different structures, the invention varies the thickness of the lateral wall locally along its longitudinal extension. This maintains the overall simple tubular structure while introducing controlled variations in specific regions to achieve desired deformation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameter (thickness) of the lateral wall along its longitudinal extension. By varying the thickness parameter from the first lateral side portion to the second lateral side portion, the deformation control is achieved without fundamentally changing the structural form, thus maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the overall external width is reduced for better vehicle configuration, then adaptability is improved, but collision resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle configuration flexibilityVSAvoidcollision resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tubular member can maintain a compact overall external width for better vehicle configuration while having specific local regions (lateral wall portions) with increased thickness to provide collision resistance. The varying thickness allows the structure to be compact overall but strong where needed during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances the controlled deformation and energy absorption of the vehicle crash box during collisions, while maintaining sufficient rigidity and resistance to high loads, thus improving the performance of the vehicle bumper structure.

Implementation Method 1

the transverse extensions of the two or more lateral sides of the lateral wall decrease in a direction away from the interface... providing controlled deformation and resistance to high loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentEP4209393B1A vehcile crash box and a vehicle crash box structure
Publication Date: 2025.04.30 AUTOTECH ENG SL
  • EP4209393B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4209393B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4209393B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle crash box (100a, 100b) for attaching a bumper beam (200) to a vehicle (230). The vehicle crash box (100a) comprises a tubular member (102) having a longitudinal extension (104) extending in a longitudinal direction (106); and an interface (108) for the attachment of the tubular member (102) to the bumper beam (200). The tubular member (102) comprises a plurality of longitudinal walls (110a-d) having a longitudinal extension (112a-d) extending in the longitudinal direction (106). The plurality of longitudinal walls (110a-d) comprises two lateral walls (110a-b) opposite one another. The lateral wall (110a; 110b) comprises two or more lateral sides (114a-c; 116a-c) spaced apart from one another in the longitudinal direction (106). The lateral side (114a-c; 116a-c) has a longitudinal extension (118a-c; 120a-c) and a transverse extension (122a-c; 124a-c). The two or more lateral sides (114a-c; 116a-c) of the lateral wall are aligned in the longitudinal direction (106). The transverse extensions (122a-c; 124a-c) of the two or more lateral sides (114a-c; 116a-c) of the lateral wall (110a; 110b) decrease in a direction (128) away from the interface (108).