Crash Guard Impact Detection for Hidden Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision detection systems are not effectively designed for fixedly erected crash guards, as they fail to detect non-visually apparent damage, leading to potential risks in industrial environments where forklifts are used, and existing solutions are costly and complex when adapted for static structures.

Innovation Solution

A collision detection system that uses sensors to measure acceleration and calculate impact energy, comparing it to threshold values, generating an alarm for impacts above a preset value, and recording crash history to plan preventive maintenance, utilizing a processing unit and algorithms to assess the state of crash guards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a crash guard undergoes plastic deformation below the maximum energy level, then the system reacts elastically and returns to its original shape, but non-visually apparent internal damage occurs which reduces initial strength and creates safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of crash guardVSAvoidvisibility of damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a color-changing indicator system that visually signals the state of the crash guard. When the crash guard is subjected to impact forces, indicators change color to display different states (e.g., green for safe, yellow for damaged, red for critical), making internal damage visible without requiring complex sensors or electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Measurement precision

If vehicle-based collision detection systems with multiple position sensors are used to detect impacts, then the three-dimensional image comparison can determine impact location, but the system becomes costly and complex for fixedly erected structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential function of impact detection from complex vehicle-based systems. Instead of using multiple position sensors and three-dimensional image processing, it employs a simplified mechanism with mechanical indicators that directly show impact location and severity through color changes, eliminating the need for electronic processing while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive, simple mechanical indicators that can be easily replaced rather than investing in costly, complex electronic sensor systems. The indicators are designed to be low-cost components that provide sufficient information for safety assessment without requiring sophisticated processing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If forklift drivers cause heavy crashes without reporting them when no visible damage is apparent, then operational continuity is maintained, but the crash guard suffers serious internal damage that creates risks for subsequent crashes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a visual feedback system through color-changing indicators that immediately show the crash guard's state after impact. This provides drivers and operators with clear information about damage levels, enabling them to make informed decisions about whether to continue operations or report the incident, thus maintaining both productivity and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system makes invisible damage visible, allowing for timely maintenance and reducing the risk of system failure by accurately assessing the impact energy and type of crashes, thereby ensuring the safety of pedestrians and protected structures.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor for detecting an acceleration on or against the crash guard (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentEP3592901B1Collision detection system for a crash guard
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 BOPLAN
  • EP3592901B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3592901B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3592901B1 patent drawingFigure 7~9

AI summary

This invention relates to a collision detection system (1) for detecting and assessing the state of a crash guard (2), comprising at least one crash guard (2), which is provided with a sensor for detecting a collision onto or against the said crash guard (2), wherein the said system comprises a processing unit, which is provided to assess, on the basis of the signals generated by the sensor, the effect of a collision on the crash guard (2) and, if necessary, to initiate an alarm signal.