Vehicle Crash Impact Detection Using Multi-Phone Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle crash prediction systems face challenges in accuracy, particularly in verifying predictions before taking actions, as they often rely on data from a single mobile device, leading to potential false alarms and difficulties in independently confirming crash events.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize data from two or more mobile devices to determine if multiple events correspond to the same crash event by aligning characteristics such as time, location, and point-of-impact, thereby reducing false predictions and enhancing verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicle crash prediction is performed based on data from a single mobile device, then the system complexity is low, but the accuracy and reliability of crash event verification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash event verification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines data from multiple mobile devices (first mobile device and second mobile device) to verify crash events. The system merges location data, time data, and crash detection data from different sources to improve verification accuracy and reduce false alarms, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary that receives and processes crash detection data from multiple mobile devices. The server performs the verification by comparing location coordinates, time stamps, and crash event data, acting as a mediator that enhances reliability without significantly increasing the complexity of individual mobile devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple mobile devices are used for crash prediction verification, then the accuracy of crash event detection is improved, but the quantity of data to be processed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash event detection accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential verification data from multiple mobile devices, specifically location coordinates, time stamps, and crash detection flags. By taking out only these critical data elements rather than processing all available sensor data, the system improves detection accuracy while minimizing the quantity of data that needs to be transmitted and processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a selective verification approach where only mobile devices that detect crash events are included in the verification process. Not all mobile devices in the system need to participate in every verification, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy through partial participation rather than requiring all devices to contribute data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If crash events are verified using multiple data sources, then false alarms are reduced, but the time required for verification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and pre-processing data from mobile devices before a crash event occurs. Location data and device status are maintained in ready-state, so when a crash event is detected, the verification can be performed rapidly by comparing pre-collected data rather than gathering information after the event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical verification processes with automated digital comparison algorithms. The server automatically compares location coordinates, time stamps, and crash detection data using computational methods, which is much faster than manual verification while maintaining high reliability in reducing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12128840B2Methods and systems for point of impact detection
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 CAMBRIDGE MOBILE TELEMATICS INC
  • US12128840B2 patent drawing
  • US12128840B2 patent drawing
  • US12128840B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for detecting a point-of-impact of a vehicle collision. A mobile device receives a set of sensor measurements from sensors of the mobile device. The mobile device generates a crash feature vector from the sensor measurements and one or more point-of-impact features. The mobile device executes a set of classifiers using the crash feature vector and the one or more point-of-impact features. Each classifier of the set of classifiers is configured to generate an output that is partially indicative of a point-of-impact of the collision. The mobile device generates, from the output of each classifier of the set of classifiers, a prediction of a point of impact of the vehicle collision. The mobile device then transmits an indication of the point of impact to a remote device.