Crawfish Peeling Mechanism for Variable Size and Tail Curling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated crawfish peeling devices fail to account for inconsistent shapes and sizes of crawfish and the tight curling of tails after cooking, leading to inefficiencies and concerns over quality and safety, while relying heavily on human labor for processing.

Innovation Solution

A machine vision system with a machine-learning algorithm is developed to monitor and adjust for crawfish size and orientation, combined with a mechanical system to separate heads from tails and extract meat, using a clamping, cutting, and extraction subsystems driven by a single actuator and tunable cam profile, with integrated cameras for guidance and performance tracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated peeling devices are used, then labor intensity is reduced, but the devices fail to account for inconsistent shapes and sizes of crawfish leading to processing inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor intensityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs a cam mechanism that dynamically adjusts the peeling force and angle based on the position of the crawfish tail in the peeling zone. This dynamic adjustment allows the automated device to adapt to inconsistent crawfish shapes and sizes, maintaining high processing efficiency while reducing labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates sensors that detect the position, size, and shape of crawfish as they enter the peeling zone. This feedback information is used to adjust the peeling parameters in real-time, ensuring consistent processing across varying crawfish dimensions while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If automated peeling devices are used, then human labor is reduced, but the devices cannot handle tight curling of tails after cooking resulting in quality and safety concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman laborVSAvoidquality and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism dynamically adjusts the peeling force and angle based on the position of the crawfish tail, enabling the device to handle tight curling tails effectively. This dynamic adjustment ensures complete and safe peeling while maintaining automated operation, eliminating quality and safety concerns associated with manual peeling of cooked crawfish.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device performs peeling action immediately after cooking while the tail is still pliable, before it fully curls tight. This preliminary action ensures complete peeling and removes the tail tip cleanly, preventing quality and safety issues that would arise from attempting to peel fully cooked, tightly curled tails.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional peeling methods are used, then simple processing is maintained, but 7 pounds of crawfish shells are needed to produce 1 pound of meat indicating low yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidcrawfish meat yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism dynamically optimizes the peeling force and angle to maximize meat extraction from each crawfish tail. This dynamic adjustment ensures complete removal of meat while minimizing shell waste, improving the yield ratio from approximately 1:7 to a more efficient proportion while maintaining relatively simple processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device adjusts peeling parameters such as force magnitude, angle, and duration based on the specific characteristics of each crawfish tail. These parameter changes optimize the extraction of meat from the shell, improving yield while keeping the processing method relatively simple and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250344707A1Automated crawfish peeling device
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE
  • US20250344707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344707A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system and method for processing crawfish, specifically peeling crawfish shells. The device comprises a meat extraction portion, further comprising a clamping subsystem, cutting subsystem, and extraction subsystem designed to extract the crawfish meat from the shell without human interference. In a preferred embodiment of the device, the device further comprises a head/tail separation portion designed to decapitate the crawfish without human interference. The device further incorporates a single-board computer comprising a machine-learning system and related image database designed for improved identification of the crawfish shell components by the device, resulting in greater accuracy in processing individual crawfish of varying sizes.