CRC False Alarm Mitigation Using Payload-Based SINR Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In broadband cellular networks, cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) can result in false alarms due to inaccurate signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) estimation when there are insufficient demodulation reference signal resources, leading to increased false alarm and misdetection rates, particularly in scenarios with a small number of resource blocks.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method involves reconstructing the transmitted signal after a successful CRC pass, estimating SINR based on the decoded payload, and comparing it to a threshold to determine if the CRC pass is reliable, thereby reducing false alarms and misdetections by utilizing a more robust channel estimation with additional data points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cyclic redundancy check is performed with insufficient demodulation reference signal resources, then data validation can be performed, but false alarm rate increases due to inaccurate SINR estimation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validation reliabilityVSAvoidSINR estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by reconstructing the transmitted signal from decoded payload before final validation. This preliminary reconstruction enables a second verification step where the reconstructed signal is compared against the original received signal to verify SINR estimation accuracy, thereby reducing false alarms caused by insufficient reference signal resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the decoded payload to reconstruct the transmitted signal and then verifying this reconstruction against the original signal. This feedback loop provides a mechanism to detect and correct false alarm conditions, improving the reliability of data validation when reference signal resources are limited

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If more demodulation reference signal resources are allocated, then SINR estimation accuracy improves, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSINR estimation accuracyVSAvoidreference signal resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by using the decoded payload itself to reconstruct the transmitted signal for verification purposes. Instead of requiring additional reference signal resources, the system leverages the decoded data to create its own verification signal, thereby achieving accurate SINR estimation without increasing resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being used for verification from dedicated reference signals to reconstructed signal components. By transforming the verification approach to use payload-derived signals instead of separate reference signals, the system maintains measurement precision while reducing the quantity of reference signal resources required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If CRC validation is performed without additional verification, then processing speed is maintained, but false alarm and misdetection rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by performing verification only on cases where CRC validation passes. Instead of verifying all received data, the system selectively applies the additional verification step only to potentially valid transmissions, thereby maintaining processing speed for failed cases while improving reliability for successful validations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process is segmented into two independent stages: first CRC validation, then signal reconstruction verification. This segmentation allows the system to quickly filter out invalid data through CRC checking while applying the more computationally intensive verification only to candidates that pass the initial check, preserving overall processing speed while enhancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260074831A1Cyclic Redundancy Check False Alarm Mitigation
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 DELL PROD LP
  • US20260074831A1 patent drawing
  • US20260074831A1 patent drawing
  • US20260074831A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can receive data from a device on a channel for broadband cellular communications. The system can, based on determining that a cyclic redundancy check passes for the data, decode a payload of the data to produce a transmitted signal. The system can determine a metric of signal quality for the channel based on at least a portion of the transmitted signal that is separate from a pilot resource. The system can compare the metric of signal quality to a value specified by a signal quality criterion, to produce a signal quality result, wherein, based on the signal quality result indicating that the metric of signal quality is less than the value specified by the signal quality criterion, determine that the cyclic redundancy check passing for the data comprises a false alarm, and classify the data as a discontinuous transmission; and otherwise, determine that the data is valid.