Credential Rotation for Remediating Exposed Secrets Online

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plaintext secrets, particularly bearer tokens, pose significant security risks due to exposure and complications in remediation, including false positives, expired secrets, and difficulty in identifying and invalidating them, while transitioning to identity-driven solutions like RBAC/MSI is costly and inconvenient.

Innovation Solution

An automated system identifies exposed credentials, allocates new credentials, transitions resources to use them, and invalidates the old ones, eliminating human intervention and reducing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated remediation is implemented, then remediation speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremediation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated remediation system is divided into distinct functional modules: detection module that identifies exposed credentials, validation module that verifies credential status, and remediation module that performs rotation. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall remediation speed while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation to determine whether detected credentials are actually exposed and require remediation before executing the remediation process. This preliminary action prevents unnecessary remediation of valid credentials and ensures that automated actions are only taken when truly needed, improving productivity while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If human intervention is used in remediation, then error detection is improved, but remediation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidremediation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results are validated against multiple criteria including credential status, exposure confirmation, and impact assessment. This feedback loop provides automated error detection and verification, achieving high accuracy comparable to human review while maintaining rapid automated remediation speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The remediation system performs self-validation and self-correction by automatically verifying credential exposure status and validating remediation success without requiring human intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the time penalty of human review while maintaining high accuracy through automated verification protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If bearer tokens are used, then convenience is improved, but security risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconvenienceVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the security risk of bearer token exposure into a benefit by implementing automated detection and remediation that specifically targets exposed tokens. The automated system continuously monitors for exposed credentials and rapidly responds to incidents, turning the inherent vulnerability of bearer tokens into an opportunity for proactive security management and rapid incident response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the security parameters of bearer tokens by implementing automated rotation when exposure is detected. This parameter change (from static to dynamically rotated tokens) maintains the convenience of bearer token usage while significantly reducing security risks through automated lifecycle management and exposure response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If RBAC/MSI alternatives are implemented, then security is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than fully transitioning to RBAC/MSI alternatives, the system applies automated remediation selectively to bearer token exposure incidents. This partial action approach addresses the specific security vulnerability of exposed tokens without requiring the comprehensive operational overhead of full RBAC/MSI implementation, achieving improved security at lower operational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the security management approach from static credential management to dynamic automated remediation. By implementing automated detection and rotation for bearer tokens, the system achieves security improvements comparable to RBAC/MSI without requiring the extensive operational infrastructure and management overhead of identity-driven architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12511430B2Automated remediation of exposed secrets
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12511430B2 patent drawing
  • US12511430B2 patent drawing
  • US12511430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for identifying an exposed credential that, if used, would provide access to a resource are disclosed. The techniques enable the resource to remain online while (i) a new credential is allocated for the resource, (ii) the resource is transitioned to using the new credential instead of the exposed credential, and (iii) the exposed credential is attempted to be invalidated. A credential is accessed. This credential is suspected of being in an exposed state. The credential is accessible from within an artifact and is determined to be in the exposed state. A new credential is generated. This new credential is designed to replace the exposed credential. An instruction is transmitted to the resource to cause it to transition from using the exposed credential to using the new credential. The exposed credential is then invalidated.