Credit Derivative Trading System with Real-Time Market Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional credit derivative markets are inefficient, illiquid, and costly due to regionalization, lack of standardization, and manual documentation processes, leading to operational inefficiencies and limited access for end-users, with information flow concentrated among a few large dealers.

Innovation Solution

A credit derivative trading system that enables real-time market updates, standardized interfaces for efficient transactions, and allows traders to view and manage credit derivatives in a compact and uniform format, facilitating direct interactions among participants and reducing reliance on intermediaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional credit derivative markets are regionalized and controlled by a few large dealers, then information flow is concentrated and transaction control is simplified, but market liquidity is reduced and transaction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket structureVSAvoidmarket liquidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized dealer-controlled market into a decentralized peer-to-peer trading platform. It divides the market structure into independent trading modules where individual participants can directly transact without requiring dealer intermediation, thereby increasing liquidity while reducing the complexity of centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trading platform is designed with universal functionality to accommodate diverse participant types (banks, insurers, investment firms, hedge funds) and various credit derivative instruments (CDS, CLO, CMB, CMBS). This multi-functional design enables a single platform to serve multiple market segments simultaneously, improving overall market liquidity and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual documentation processes are used in conventional markets, then operational flexibility is maintained, but transaction efficiency and standardization are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidtransaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated documentation generation and standardized transaction protocols. Participants can independently execute trades by simply specifying their requirements in the electronic marketplace, and the system automatically generates all necessary documentation and executes the transactions, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical documentation processes with an electronic automated system. The mechanical process of manually drafting, reviewing, and exchanging documentation is substituted with electronic generation, transmission, and processing of standardized documents through the trading platform, significantly improving transaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If brokers act as intermediaries in conventional dealer markets, then transaction facilitation is provided, but information dissemination efficiency is reduced and transaction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction facilitationVSAvoidinformation dissemination efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the broker intermediary from the trading process. By removing the broker layer, the system enables direct peer-to-peer transactions between participants, thereby improving information dissemination efficiency and reducing transaction costs while still providing transaction facilitation through the electronic marketplace platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic marketplace platform serves as a new type of intermediary that facilitates direct transactions between participants. Unlike traditional brokers who controlled information flow, this platform transparently disseminates market information to all participants simultaneously, enabling efficient peer-to-peer trading without the information asymmetries created by conventional brokers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If limited transactional outlets are available in conventional markets, then dealer control is maintained, but participant access and market accessibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedealer controlVSAvoidparticipant access
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional dealer-controlled market structure to a multi-dimensional peer-to-peer marketplace. The system adds multiple access dimensions by allowing participants to trade directly through the electronic platform without being routed through dealers, thereby significantly improving market accessibility and participant versatility while reducing dealer control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS7716114B2Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system
Publication Date: 2010.05.11 CREDITEX GROUP
  • US7716114B2 patent drawing
  • US7716114B2 patent drawing
  • US7716114B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A credit derivative trading system comprises a credit derivative authority configured to receive defined positions for credit derivatives and update a plurality of trade clients in real-time whenever there is movement in the market for a particular credit derivative.