Credit Profile Simulation Model Trained on Historical Actions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tools for simulating a consumer's credit profile lack the ability to learn from historical data and predict future outcomes based on current inputs, relying solely on predefined rules and algorithms.

Innovation Solution

A Machine Learning (ML) model is trained using a financial dataset that includes a consumer's financial profile, constructing a modeling dataset by associating prior and posterior credit profiles, defining financial simulations, and regressing target variables to predict changes in credit scores based on specific actions, employing techniques like grid search and cross-validation for model tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional tools use predefined rules and algorithms to simulate credit profiles, then the simulation process is simple and fast, but the tools lack the ability to learn from historical data and predict future outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to learn from historical dataVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training the machine learning model in advance using historical credit profile data. This pre-training enables the model to learn patterns and relationships from past data, which then allows it to make accurate predictions about future credit outcomes without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a computational copy of credit profile evolution by training the ML model to replicate historical credit score changes. The model learns to copy the relationships between financial actions and credit outcomes from historical data, enabling it to simulate and predict future credit profile changes based on similar patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If conventional tools use predefined rules to simulate credit profiles, then the system is easy to operate, but it cannot predict patterns or future outcomes based on current inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using historical credit outcomes to continuously improve the model's predictions. The ML model learns from the feedback of actual credit score changes resulting from various financial actions, adjusting its internal parameters to minimize prediction errors and improve future prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by adjusting the model's internal parameters through training on historical data. The ML model modifies its weights and biases based on learned patterns from historical credit profiles, enabling it to capture complex non-linear relationships between financial actions and credit outcomes that predefined rules cannot represent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If an ML model is trained to simulate credit profiles, then prediction capability is improved, but data processing and model training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit profile simulation accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the computationally intensive model training in advance as a preliminary action. Once the ML model is trained on historical data, it can make rapid predictions about credit profile changes without requiring additional training time. This upfront investment in training enables fast, accurate predictions when the model is deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by using the trained model to continuously make predictions about credit profile changes. Once trained, the model can rapidly evaluate multiple scenarios and provide ongoing predictions without requiring repeated training cycles, thus minimizing time loss while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250384339A1Methods and systems for training a machine learning model for financial simulations
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 CREDIT SESAME INC
  • US20250384339A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384339A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384339A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Using various embodiments techniques to train a machine learning model to perform financial simulations are described herein. In one embodiment, this includes receiving a financial dataset that includes financial profiles of various consumers that includes features related to a financial condition of the consumers. A modeling dataset is constructed by associating a first and second credit profile of each consumer that reflects a change in the consumer's credit profile. Action(s) used to reflect this change are determined to define financial simulations. A target variable is constructed by subtracting a first credit profile feature from a second credit profile feature. A portion of the modeling dataset is reserved for evaluation purposes and the remainder is used to regress the target variable on a feature aggregated from the first credit profile with the action taken to result in the change. The model is then fine-tuned and evaluated on the reserved portion.