Credit Scoring System Daily Data Update Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current credit scoring systems, such as those using FICO scores and First Data Resources Corporation's risk scores, primarily update on a monthly basis, which may not accurately reflect recent credit behavior, leading to potential defaults and affecting profit margins for credit card issuers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for evaluating creditworthiness by daily and periodic updates from credit reporting organizations and account transaction data, combining historical and recent behavior data to generate a credit score ranging from 0 to 980, allowing for more accurate prediction of credit risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If credit scoring systems update on a monthly basis, then system complexity and data processing requirements are reduced, but the accuracy of predicting credit defaults deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of predicting credit defaultsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the credit scoring system into multiple independent data sources (credit reporting organizations, account transaction data, historical behavior data) that can be updated at different frequencies. This allows daily updates of critical data without requiring complete system reconstruction, thereby improving prediction accuracy while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts data update frequencies based on the importance and volatility of different data types. Critical data such as account transaction data and significant events are updated daily, while less volatile data like historical credit reports are updated periodically. This dynamic approach optimizes prediction accuracy without uniformly increasing system complexity across all data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If daily updates of credit information are implemented, then the accuracy of credit risk assessment is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of credit risk assessmentVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and prioritizes only the most critical data elements for daily processing, such as significant events, new delinquencies, and recent account transactions. Less critical historical data is updated periodically rather than daily. This extraction approach maintains high credit risk assessment accuracy while significantly reducing the volume of data requiring daily processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by updating only the necessary subset of credit data daily rather than complete credit files. Critical indicators are refreshed daily to maintain assessment accuracy, while comprehensive credit reports are updated less frequently, optimizing the balance between processing time and assessment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If multiple data sources are integrated for credit scoring, then the predictive capability is improved, but system complexity and integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive capabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data integration architecture that handles multiple data sources (credit reporting organizations, account transaction systems, historical behavior databases) through standardized interfaces and common processing logic. This multi-functional framework enables the system to integrate diverse data types while maintaining manageable complexity through consistent data handling procedures across all sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary data processing layers that standardize and normalize data from different sources before integration. These intermediaries translate various data formats and structures into a unified schema, facilitating seamless integration of multiple data sources while reducing the complexity of direct point-to-point connections between systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If historical and recent behavior data are both incorporated, then the comprehensiveness of credit evaluation is improved, but data management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of credit evaluationVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent organizes historical and recent behavior data along temporal dimensions, with recent data (daily updates) separated from historical data (periodic updates). This dimensional organization allows the system to maintain comprehensive credit evaluation by preserving both timeframes while simplifying data management through time-based segmentation and differentiated update strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS7689506B2System and method for rapid updating of credit information
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US7689506B2 patent drawing
  • US7689506B2 patent drawing
  • US7689506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, the invention relates to a system and method for evaluating the creditworthiness of an account holder of a credit account comprising the steps of determining, at least once a day, whether a first data set relating to the creditworthiness of the account holder has been received from a credit reporting organization; determining, at least once a day, whether a second data set relating to transaction activity of the credit account has been received; periodically receiving from a credit reporting organization a third data set relating to the creditworthiness of the account holder; periodically receiving a fourth data set relating to the historical activity of the credit account; and using the first and second data sets, to the extent they have been received, and the third and fourth data sets to determine a measure of creditworthiness.