Credit Segmentation Using Multiple Dependent Variables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current credit scoring methods using regression tree analysis are limited by their reliance on a single dependent variable, leading to sub-optimal partitioning and inefficient risk segmentation in credit reporting agencies, as they fail to effectively identify and optimize segments based on multiple dependent variables and risk scores.

Innovation Solution

The proposed systems and methods leverage attribute-based segmentation in conjunction with a general risk score and a profile model, utilizing multiple dependent variables to create a more nuanced segmentation scheme that optimizes partitions and improves risk assessment by using techniques like CART analysis and logistic regression to develop a segmentation scheme that minimizes misclassification across sub-populations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional regression tree analysis using a single dependent variable is used for segmentation, then the methodology is simple and easy to implement, but the segmentation performance and risk assessment accuracy are sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk segmentation accuracyVSAvoidsegmentation model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the population into multiple sub-populations using regression tree analysis with multiple dependent variables. Instead of using a single dependent variable as in traditional methods, the system segments consumers based on multiple risk-related outcomes simultaneously, creating more homogeneous and predictive segments that improve risk assessment accuracy while maintaining the interpretability of tree-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from single-dimensional segmentation (one dependent variable) to multi-dimensional segmentation by incorporating multiple dependent variables in the regression tree analysis. This dimensional expansion allows the model to capture complex relationships between consumer characteristics and multiple risk outcomes simultaneously, improving segmentation performance without sacrificing the structured approach of regression trees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple dependent variables are used for segmentation, then the risk assessment accuracy improves, but the complexity of the segmentation scheme increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit risk assessment reliabilityVSAvoidsegmentation scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the credit population into distinct sub-populations using regression tree analysis that evaluates multiple dependent variables simultaneously. This segmentation approach creates homogeneous groups with similar risk profiles, improving the reliability of credit risk assessment by ensuring that each segment is characterized by consistent risk patterns across multiple outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The regression tree segmentation model serves multiple functions by evaluating multiple dependent variables across all segments simultaneously. Rather than requiring separate models for different risk outcomes, the multi-variable regression tree provides a universal segmentation framework that assesses multiple risk dimensions (e.g., default risk, bankruptcy risk, delinquency risk) within a single integrated structure, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If attribute-centric tree-based approach is used, then the segmentation is straightforward, but the rank ordering effectiveness is limited compared to risk-based scores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk ranking efficiencyVSAvoidrisk differentiation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the traditional attribute-centric approach by changing the fundamental parameter used for segmentation from individual credit attributes to multiple risk-based dependent variables. This parameter change enables the model to directly optimize for risk differentiation and rank ordering effectiveness, as the segmentation is driven by outcomes that directly measure risk rather than by input attributes that indirectly relate to risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-dimensional risk assessment (one dependent variable) to multi-dimensional risk evaluation by incorporating multiple dependent variables in the regression tree. This dimensional expansion enhances risk differentiation precision by capturing multiple facets of credit risk simultaneously, allowing for more effective rank ordering of consumers across different risk dimensions while maintaining the productivity of a unified segmentation framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8560434B2Methods and systems for segmentation using multiple dependent variables
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 VANTAGESCORE SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US8560434B2 patent drawing
  • US8560434B2 patent drawing
  • US8560434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for optimal partitioning of segments in a consumer credit segmentation tree comprising defining a first attribute-based independent variable on a first tree using a primary dependent variable having two classes, defining a second attribute-based independent variable on the first tree using the primary dependent variable, defining risk tiers for the first attribute-based independent variable on the first tree using a first risk score and the primary dependent variable, defining risk tiers for the second attribute-based independent variable on the first tree using a second risk score and the primary dependent variable, superimposing the first tree structure, based on the primary dependent variable, onto a second tree, and defining profiles in the risk tiers for the second attribute-based independent variable with a profile dependent variable having two classes, completing the second tree, wherein the second tree is used to segment a population according to credit related behavior.