Creep Compensation in Microlithographic Optical Imaging Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In microlithographic optical systems using extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light, conventional designs face challenges in maintaining high imaging accuracy due to creep and settling effects in vibration decoupling devices, leading to changes in the static relative situation between supporting structures, which require large motion reserves in the relative situation control device, increasing costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A microlithographic optical arrangement with a creep compensation device that actively adjusts the length or distance of supporting spring devices to compensate for changes in static relative situations, using controllable active adjustment elements such as force actuators, Lorentz actuators, or piezoelectric elements to maintain initial states and reduce the need for extensive motion reserves in the relative situation control device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If vibration decoupling devices with supporting spring devices are used to support the second supporting structure, then vibration isolation is improved, but creep and settling effects cause changes in static relative situation over time, requiring large motion reserves and increasing device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolationVSAvoidmotion reserve requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The creep compensation device performs preliminary action by actively adjusting the supporting spring devices to compensate for anticipated creep and settling effects. The control device monitors changes in static relative situation and proactively adjusts the supporting structures before these changes affect imaging accuracy, thereby reducing the motion reserve requirements of the relative situation control device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the control device that continuously monitors the static relative situation between the first and second supporting structures. When creep or settling effects cause positional changes, the control device sends adjustment commands to the creep compensation device, which then modifies the supporting spring devices to restore the original relative positioning, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the relative situation control device is designed with large motion reserves to compensate for creep effects, then imaging accuracy is maintained, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging accuracyVSAvoidcontrol device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the control function into two distinct parts: the relative situation control device handles dynamic positioning adjustments, while the creep compensation device specifically addresses long-term creep and settling effects. This segmentation allows each device to be optimized for its specific function, reducing the motion reserve requirements of the relative situation control device and lowering overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The creep compensation device acts as an intermediary between the supporting structures and the relative situation control device. It compensates for creep effects at the support level, thereby protecting the relative situation control device from having to handle these low-frequency drifts, which reduces its motion reserve requirements and simplifies its design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If supporting spring devices are used for vibration decoupling, then dynamic vibration isolation is improved, but long-term static position stability deteriorates due to creep effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolation responseVSAvoidstatic relative situation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the supporting spring devices adjustable through the creep compensation device. While the spring devices provide passive vibration isolation, their length or distance from the supporting structures can be actively modified in response to detected creep effects, allowing the system to adapt its static position while maintaining its dynamic vibration isolation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The creep compensation device changes the physical parameters of the supporting spring devices, specifically their length or distance from the supporting structures, to compensate for creep effects. By adjusting these parameters in response to monitored static relative situation changes, the system maintains position stability while preserving the vibration isolation properties of the spring devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for high imaging quality with reduced motion reserves in the relative situation control device, minimizing costs and maintaining imaging accuracy over the system's lifetime by compensating for creep and settling effects, thereby simplifying the design and operation of the optical imaging device.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of supporting spring devices of a vibration decoupling device, which act kinematically parallel to one another between the first supporting structure and the second supporting structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

using controllable active adjustment elements such as force actuators, Lorentz actuators, or piezoelectric elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

using controllable active adjustment elements such as force actuators, Lorentz actuators, or piezoelectric elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11703770B2Compensation of creep effects in an imaging device
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US11703770B2 patent drawing
  • US11703770B2 patent drawing
  • US11703770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement of a microlithographic optical imaging device includes first and supporting structures. The first supporting structure supports an optical element of the imaging device. The first supporting structure supports the second supporting structure via supporting spring devices of a vibration decoupling device. The supporting spring devices act kinematically parallel to one another between the first and second supporting structures. Each supporting spring device defines a supporting force direction and a supporting length along the supporting force direction. The second supporting structure supports a measuring device configured to measure the position and/or orientation of the optical element in relation to a reference in at least one degree of freedom and up to all six degrees of freedom in space. A creep compensation device compensates a change in a static relative situation between the first and second supporting structures in at least one correction degree of freedom.