Crinkled Graphene Polymer Composites With Tuned Surface Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Graphene sheets and graphite particles struggle to provide sufficient active sites for functionalization and surface area for bonding with polymers, limiting the enhancement of mechanical properties in composite materials.

Innovation Solution

Producing tuned carbon structures, such as crinkled graphene, in a plasma reactor and combining them with polymers to create composite materials, allowing for independent control of specific surface area and active area, which enhances mechanical properties through improved interlocking and bonding with the polymer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If graphene sheets or graphite particles are used as reinforcement material, then electrical conductivity is improved, but the ability to provide sufficient active sites for functionalization and bonding with polymer is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidbonding with polymer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines graphene sheets with carbon nanotubes to create a composite carbon structure that leverages the electrical conductivity of graphene and the high surface area-to-volume ratio of carbon nanotubes, providing both electrical conductivity and sufficient active sites for polymer bonding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies chemical functionalization specifically at the interfaces between carbon structures and polymer matrix, creating localized regions with enhanced bonding capability while maintaining the bulk electrical conductivity properties of the carbon reinforcement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If carbon fibers are aligned within polymer melt to enhance mechanical properties, then tensile strength is improved, but the processing complexity and alignment control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidalignment control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses curved and branched carbon nanotube structures instead of straight rigid fibers, which naturally orient during processing and provide mechanical reinforcement without requiring complex alignment control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies processing parameters such as viscosity and temperature to enable spontaneous alignment of carbon structures during composite formation, eliminating the need for complex external alignment control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If chemical functionalization is applied to increase bonding interaction between carbon and polymer, then interfacial strength is improved, but the active sites for further functionalization are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterfacial strengthVSAvoidactive sites for functionalization
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite carbon structure where different carbon components serve different functions: graphene provides electrical conductivity, carbon nanotubes provide high surface area for bonding, and the composite architecture maintains both conductivity and bonding capacity simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting composite materials exhibit exceptional mechanical properties due to the unique physical and chemical mechanisms between crinkled graphene and the polymer, offering high strength, rigidity, and customized modulus without increasing the viscosity of the uncured polymer-carbon mixture.

Implementation Method 1

The plasma reactor has a first control for tuning the specific surface area of the resulting tuned carbon structures as well as a second, independent control for tuning the specific active area of the tuned carbon structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS20240010818A1Composite materials systems
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 LYTEN INC
  • US20240010818A1 patent drawing
  • US20240010818A1 patent drawing
  • US20240010818A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods include producing tunable carbon structures and combining carbon structures with a polymer to form a composite material. Carbon structures include crinkled graphene. Methods also include functionalizing the carbon structures, either in-situ, within the plasma reactor, or in a liquid collection facility. The plasma reactor has a first control for tuning the specific surface area (SSA) of the resulting tuned carbon structures as well as a second, independent control for tuning the SSA of the tuned carbon structures. The composite materials that result from mixing the tuned carbon structures with a polymer results in composite materials that exhibit exceptional favorable mechanical and/or other properties. Mechanisms that operate between the carbon structures and the polymer yield composite materials that exhibit these exceptional mechanical properties are also examined.