CRM Email Triage via Machine Learning Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users working on multiple tasks in task database systems often face challenges in timely responding to emails due to the high volume of messages, making it time-consuming and inefficient to manually identify and reply to emails that require attention.

Innovation Solution

A cloud server-based system that retrieves task metadata, identifies source and target email domains, and uses machine learning models to analyze email content to automatically determine and notify users of emails that need a response, providing a graphical user interface for direct reply actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a user manually goes through each received email message in an inbox, then the user can identify emails that need a reply, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail identification accuracyVSAvoidtime spent on manual email review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of reviewing emails with an automated machine learning-based system. The ML model analyzes email content, sender relationships, and task data to automatically identify and prioritize emails requiring responses, eliminating the need for users to manually sort through their inboxes while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing the email triage function that would otherwise require user intervention. The ML model autonomously evaluates incoming emails, determines which ones need replies, and presents them to users in a prioritized manner, allowing users to focus only on actionable emails without manual sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If a user works on multiple tasks simultaneously, then the user can handle diverse responsibilities, but the user may not be able to follow up and reply to email messages in a timely manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-task handling capabilityVSAvoidemail response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring email patterns, task progress, and user behavior. The ML model learns from this feedback to improve its predictions about which emails require responses, adapting to each user's specific workflow and communication patterns to maintain high response speed across multiple tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary intelligent system that acts as a mediator between multiple tasks and email communications. This ML-based intermediary prioritizes and organizes emails according to task urgency and importance, allowing users to efficiently switch between tasks while ensuring timely email responses through the intermediary's continuous management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If a cloud server uses machine learning models to analyze email content, then the system can automatically determine emails that need a reply, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail analysis automationVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex email analysis system into distinct modular components: an ML model training module, an email analysis module, a task management module, and a user interface module. Each component handles a specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable, maintainable, and scalable while achieving high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11893427B2Method for determining and notifying users of pending activities on CRM data
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 CLARI INC
  • US11893427B2 patent drawing
  • US11893427B2 patent drawing
  • US11893427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes various embodiments for determining emails that each need a response based on data from a customer relationship (CRM) system. In one embodiment, a method of determining such emails includes the operations of retrieving open tasks assigned to a user from a task database; determining one or more source email domains for one or more source contacts, and one or more target email domains for one or more target contacts; and determining one or more threads emails exchanged between the source contacts and the target contacts based on the source email domains and the target email domains. The method further includes the operations of creating an email list from the threads of emails, including a latest email from a group that was sent by a target contact; and generating a subset of the list of emails by analyzing contents of each of the list of emails using a machine learning model.