Crop Canopy Gleaning Machine Weed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organic farmers face challenges in effectively controlling weeds within crop rows without using synthetic herbicides, as conventional methods are costly and ineffective in preventing weed seeding for future seasons, and manual removal is labor-intensive and incomplete.

Innovation Solution

A farm machinery vehicle with a cutting mechanism that allows precise maneuverability between crop rows, equipped with interchangeable cutting tools and a collection device to remove weeds above the crop canopy, preventing seed dispersal and promoting soil nutrient decomposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual crews are hired to remove weeds from crops, then weed removal effectiveness is improved, but labor cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed removal effectivenessVSAvoidlabor cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical weed removal with an automated vehicle-mounted cutting mechanism. The vehicle travels through crop rows and uses a cutting device to trim weeds above the crop canopy, eliminating the need for manual labor crews while maintaining effective weed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting mechanism is designed to operate autonomously as the vehicle moves through the field. The system self-regulates the cutting height to match the crop canopy level and automatically trims weeds without requiring continuous manual intervention, reducing labor dependency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual crews trim weeds above the canopy, then current season weed control is improved, but weed seeding for next year is not prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent season weed controlVSAvoidweed seeding for future seasons
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting mechanism is designed to remove not only the visible weed canopy above the crops but also the seed pods and reproductive structures. By extracting and removing these harmful elements along with the trimmed weeds, the system prevents seed dispersal and future weed regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary cutting and collection of weeds before they can complete their reproductive cycle and disperse seeds. By acting early in the weed growth cycle and removing the entire weed structure including seed pods, it prevents the harmful seeding effect before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional weed control methods are used between crop rows, then inter-row weed control is improved, but weeds within crop rows remain uncontrolled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-row weed controlVSAvoidintra-row weeds
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the weed control function into two parts: conventional methods handle inter-row weeds, while the new vehicle-mounted cutting mechanism handles intra-row weeds. The cutting device is positioned to operate specifically within crop rows, targeting weeds that grow among the crops without affecting inter-row areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting mechanism is designed with selective operational characteristics - it activates only when detecting weeds within crop rows and adjusts its cutting path to avoid crops. This localised application of cutting power provides targeted intra-row weed control while leaving inter-row areas to conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If a vehicle is made wider to cut more crop rows simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but maneuverability among crops deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of rows cut simultaneouslyVSAvoidmaneuverability among crops
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is designed with dynamic adjustment capabilities - the cutting mechanism can be raised, lowered, or repositioned based on crop row spacing and field conditions. This dynamic flexibility allows the vehicle to adapt to different row configurations, maintaining maneuverability while optimizing the number of rows that can be serviced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11606905B2Crop canopy gleaning machine
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 GREGG MICHELLE D
  • US11606905B2 patent drawing
  • US11606905B2 patent drawing
  • US11606905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some crops, such as soybeans, grow close to the ground, having a low canopy relative to that of weeds growing interspersed in the crop. A farm implement removes weed growth above the crop canopy. The implement has a chassis with at least three wheels connected to the chassis, a cutting mechanism, mounted at a front end of the chassis, a means for collecting weed growth cut by the cutting mechanism, mounted on the chassis, means for generating and selectively applying rotational torque to at least one of the at least three wheels and means for a user to guide the chassis down the rows in which the crop is grown.