Pivoting Crop Cutter Knives to Prevent Rotor Jamming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices in crop harvesters face issues with knives becoming jammed or striking the rotor during maintenance, leading to damage when the frame is pivoted, and additional efforts are required to prevent such occurrences.

Innovation Solution

A cutting unit with knives pivotally mounted on a frame, limited by a stop and associated with levers and springs, prevents knives from moving into unsuitable positions by using actuators to control their movement and the frame's position, ensuring safe operation and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If the frame is pivoted downwards to the maintenance position, then maintenance work can be performed on the knives, but the knives may become jammed between the rotor and frame or strike the rotor causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessibilityVSAvoidknife positioning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by moving the knives to a retracted position before pivoting the frame to the maintenance position. The control system detects the frame position and automatically retracts the knives using the first actuator prior to maintenance, preventing jamming between the rotor and frame while maintaining reliable positioning throughout the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through position detection means that monitor the frame position and control system logic that responds to these detections. The system continuously feedbacks the frame angle and knife position, automatically adjusting knife retraction based on whether the frame is in operating or maintenance position, thereby preventing damage while enabling safe maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the roller is pulled out of the recess by the actuator, then the knife can move freely, but the knife may move into an unsuitable position and strike the rotor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknife movement freedomVSAvoid rotor damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the control system as an intermediary between the actuator and knife movement. The control system mediates the knife retraction process by detecting frame position and only allowing knife movement to the retracted position when appropriate, preventing direct uncontrolled movement that would cause the knife to strike the rotor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical roller-and-recess holding mechanism with a controlled actuator system guided by electronic control and position detection. This substitution allows precise control of knife movement, enabling the knife to move freely when needed while preventing harmful movements through automated position management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If additional means are used to prevent knife movement, then rotor damage is prevented, but the channel cross-section is restricted and additional effort is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknife position controlVSAvoidchannel obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the knife position adjustable rather than fixed. The knives can dynamically change position between extended (during operation) and retracted (during maintenance) states, controlled by actuators and management system. This eliminates the need for static physical restrictions that would obstruct the channel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the position parameter of the knives based on operational conditions. The control system modifies the knife position parameter automatically - extended for cutting operation, retracted for maintenance - eliminating the need for permanent physical barriers in the channel while maintaining reliable position control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents knife jamming and rotor damage by controlling knife movement and frame position, facilitating safe operation and maintenance without additional channel restrictions.

Implementation Method 1

The roller is pre-tensioned into the recess by the force of a spring. This allows the knives to deflect downwards in the event of an overload... The roller and spring automatically return the knives to their original position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

Gravity or the flow of the harvested crop then moves the knife into its lower, inactive position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

Gravity or the flow of the harvested crop then moves the knife into its lower, inactive position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow force: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP4417037B1Cutting device for stalk-shaped agricultural crop
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 DEERE & CO
  • EP4417037B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4417037B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4417037B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a cutting unit (38) for straw-like agricultural crops, comprising a number of knives (40) arranged side by side transversely to a channel (36) through which crops flow in a flow direction (42) during normal operation, and pivotally mounted on a frame (46) of the cutting unit (38) on the upstream side of the knives (40) located in the channel (36) about a pivot axis (44) extending transversely to the channel (36) between a working position and a position pivoted out of the channel (36). The movement of the knife (40) from the working position into the channel (36) is limited by a stop (70) fixedly connected to the frame (46), which interacts with an edge (68) of the knife (40). The invention further relates to a straw harvesting machine.