Crop Field Control Using ML Predictions and Dynamic Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for increasing crop yields often focus on single or limited sources of stress, failing to account for the interactive effects between multiple factors that affect plant productivity, such as soil moisture, temperature, and other environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize monitoring sensors to collect data on various field conditions, apply machine learning algorithms to predict optimal environmental adjustments, and control devices to autonomously regulate factors like water, energy, and nutrient supply, considering interactions between multiple variables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional methods focus on single or limited sources of stress to improve plant productivity, then the intervention complexity is reduced, but the system fails to account for interactive effects between multiple factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervention complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of productivity regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex agricultural environment into multiple measurable parameters (soil moisture, temperature, nutrient levels, pest presence) and addresses each separately through dedicated sensors and control mechanisms, allowing comprehensive monitoring without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple monitoring functions and control capabilities into a single unified platform that can simultaneously track various environmental factors and coordinate appropriate responses, achieving comprehensive productivity regulation through one system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms are used to predict optimal environmental adjustments, then the precision of productivity optimization is improved, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of environmental condition predictionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical agricultural data to learn optimal responses to various environmental conditions, enabling the system to make accurate predictions without requiring complex real-time computations during critical decision windows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intelligent software layer that acts as an intermediary between simple sensors and actuators, using pre-trained machine learning models to translate basic environmental measurements into optimized control decisions without requiring complex hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic threshold adjustment is implemented to optimize plant productivity, then the adaptability to changing conditions is improved, but the difficulty of system operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental changesVSAvoidease of system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors plant responses and environmental conditions, automatically adjusting thresholds based on feedback from sensors and machine learning predictions, enabling adaptive optimization without requiring manual intervention or expert knowledge from operators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of operational parameters and thresholds based on real-time data and learned patterns, making the system adaptive to changing conditions while eliminating the need for manual reconfiguration or expert operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11833313B2Systems and methods for monitoring and regulating plant productivity
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 HORTAU INC
  • US11833313B2 patent drawing
  • US11833313B2 patent drawing
  • US11833313B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System for monitoring and regulating plant productivity comprising: a memory for storing instructions; a processor for executing the instructions to cause a method of monitoring and regulating plant productivity to be performed, the method comprising: receiving field data from monitoring sensors; computing, by the at least one processor executing a machine learning algorithm, a predicted value for a variable associated with the production environment condition of a crop field, the machine learning algorithm having been trained based on a training set comprising one or both of (a) the field data from the monitoring sensors, and (b) a generated feature derived from the field data; and determining, based on a threshold associated with the variable, that the predicted value for the variable indicates that an intervention in the crop field is to be initiated; and in response to the determining, causing a controllable device to vary the production environment condition.