Dynamic Crop Header Height and Divider Angle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crop header adjustment systems are inefficient in dynamically adjusting header height and row divider angle in response to varying crop and ground conditions, leading to potential damage and reduced harvest efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors, a database, and a processor that adjusts header height and row divider angle based on real-time data from sensors and pre-recorded information, allowing for on-the-go adjustments to optimize harvesting while minimizing damage to equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual adjustment mechanisms are used for row dividers, then the structure remains simple, but the harvesting efficiency and adaptability to varying conditions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidadjustment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The row divider adjustment mechanism transforms from a static manual system to a dynamic automated system. Motors are integrated to enable continuous or periodic adjustment of row divider angles based on real-time sensor feedback about crop conditions, ground topography, and harvest quality metrics, allowing the system to adapt dynamically during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback control system is implemented where sensors continuously monitor crop conditions, ground surface characteristics, and harvest performance. This data is processed by a controller that automatically adjusts row divider angles to optimize harvesting efficiency, creating a closed-loop system that responds to actual field conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed header height is maintained, then the structure remains stable, but the adaptability to varying crop and ground conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to conditionsVSAvoidheight control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header height control system transitions from a fixed position to a dynamically adjustable position. Motors and actuators enable the header to automatically raise or lower based on sensor inputs regarding ground topography, crop height variations, and optimal harvest parameters, maintaining stability while adapting to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The header height control system operates autonomously using onboard sensors and processors to monitor field conditions and automatically adjust header position without operator intervention. The system self-regulates based on real-time data about ground elevation, crop conditions, and harvest quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If continuous monitoring and adjustment are implemented, then the harvesting efficiency improves, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanisms operate periodically rather than continuously. Sensors monitor conditions continuously, but motors and actuators only activate when threshold changes are detected or at predetermined intervals, reducing energy consumption while maintaining harvesting efficiency through targeted adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20220225569A1Apparatus, Systems, And Methods For Row Crop Headers
Publication Date: 2022.07.21 AG LEADER TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20220225569A1 patent drawing
  • US20220225569A1 patent drawing
  • US20220225569A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A crop header adjustment system including a plurality of row units, a plurality of dividers disposed between the row units, a plurality of pitch adjustment mechanisms operatively engaged with each of the plurality of dividers, and a controller in communication with the each of the plurality of pitch adjustment mechanisms. The controller configured to adjust the pitch of the plurality of the dividers on-the-go in response to changing conditions.