Crop Irrigation UI for Zone-Based Scheduling and Nutrient Dosing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current crop growing management systems, particularly in agriculture and landscaping, face challenges in efficiently managing irrigation and nutrient distribution across different crop zones with varying requirements, as existing systems lack a comprehensive and user-friendly interface for scheduling and monitoring irrigation and crop growth.

Innovation Solution

A computer-controlled irrigation system with an internet-enabled user interface that allows farmers to specify, schedule, and monitor irrigation and crop growth, incorporating sensors for real-time data, and featuring software components for crop irrigation specification, nutrient dosing, and predictive modeling to optimize water and nutrient allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a comprehensive irrigation management system is implemented to handle multiple crop zones with varying requirements, then the precision of water and nutrient delivery is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of water and nutrient deliveryVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the irrigation management into discrete crop zones with unique identifiers, each having specific water and nutrient requirements. The mainline is segmented into multiple valves that can be independently controlled, allowing precise delivery to different zones without managing the entire system as a single complex unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each crop zone is assigned specific characteristics (crop type, growth stage, soil conditions) that determine its local water and nutrient requirements. The system applies different irrigation schedules and nutrient dosing to each zone based on its specific needs rather than using a uniform approach across the entire farm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If real-time sensor data collection and predictive modeling are added to optimize crop growth, then the productivity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop growth optimizationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses predictive models to forecast future crop conditions and irrigation needs before they occur. By analyzing current sensor data and weather forecasts, the system pre-calculates optimal irrigation schedules and nutrient dosing in advance, allowing proactive optimization rather than reactive adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects real-time sensor data from the field (soil moisture, weather conditions) and uses this feedback to adjust irrigation and nutrient delivery. The predictive models incorporate this feedback loop to refine forecasts and optimize crop growth dynamically based on actual field conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If an intuitive user interface is designed to simplify irrigation scheduling for operators, then the ease of operation is improved, but the software complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of irrigation schedulingVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates irrigation schedules and nutrient dosing plans based on crop zone characteristics and current conditions, reducing the need for manual operator input. The intuitive interface presents pre-calculated recommendations that operators can review and approve with minimal effort, rather than requiring complex manual scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The user interface acts as an intermediary layer between the complex backend systems (sensors, predictive models, irrigation controllers) and the operator. It translates complex system data and control options into simple, visual representations and straightforward controls, hiding the underlying software complexity while maintaining full system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11510373B2User interface for a computerized crop growing management system and method
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 NETAFIM LTD
  • US11510373B2 patent drawing
  • US11510373B2 patent drawing
  • US11510373B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized crop growing management system (CMS) for a farm includes a main controller with an associated user interface (UI). The farm has a plurality of fields on each of which a different crop may be raised, each crop having different irrigation and nutrient requirements. Each field is fed by a main irrigation line connected to a network of irrigation pipes having controller-based valves. Sensors monitor growing conditions in each field. The UI is configured to permit an operator to monitor growing conditions, and control the supply of irrigation liquid and nutrients to each field and/or each crop. The UI allows the operator to specify and create irrigation schedules, nutrient recipes and flow rates, as well as warn an operator of technical and crop problems.