Crop Prediction Engine Using Random Forest Covariate Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural technologies face challenges in predicting crop yields accurately due to the complexity of environmental and soil factors, leading to inefficient decision-making and plateaued crop yield growth rates, despite advancements in data collection and remote sensing technologies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a crop prediction engine that applies a random forest prediction model to seasonal crop data, soil data, and mapping data, ranking significant covariates to predict crop yields, and incorporating explainable AI and machine learning to optimize agricultural production and seed selection based on soil characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If growers use more remote sensing technologies and data collection methods, then information availability increases, but total factor productivity and crop yield growth rates remain plateaued

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoidcrop yield growth rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a crop prediction engine as an intermediary system that processes and integrates data from multiple sources (remote sensing, soil sensors, weather stations, historical yield data) to generate actionable predictions. This intermediary transforms raw information into predictive insights about crop yields, helping growers make informed decisions despite the plateau in overall productivity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical and chemical approaches to increasing crop yields with an information-based system using machine learning and predictive analytics. Instead of relying solely on increasing fertilizer application or genetic modifications, the system uses computational models to predict optimal planting strategies, crop selection, and resource allocation based on environmental covariates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If growers receive more information from agronomists and consultants, then decision-making options increase, but decision-making efficiency decreases due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddecision-making efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies the most critical environmental covariates and key drivers from the vast amount of available data using feature importance analysis and ranking algorithms. By extracting only the most relevant factors (such as soil moisture, temperature, precipitation patterns, and specific soil properties), the system filters out unnecessary information and presents growers with focused, actionable insights rather than overwhelming them with complete datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing customized predictions and recommendations specific to each field location, soil type, and crop variety. The system processes data at a fine spatial resolution (voxel-level) to generate location-specific yield predictions and planting recommendations, allowing growers to make precise local decisions rather than applying blanket strategies across entire farms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If traditional crop yield prediction methods are used, then simplicity is maintained, but prediction precision is insufficient for optimal agricultural decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction model simplicityVSAvoidcrop yield prediction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters and structure of prediction models by employing ensemble machine learning methods (random forests, gradient boosting, neural networks) that can capture complex non-linear relationships between environmental covariates and crop yields. The system evaluates multiple model configurations and selects the optimal model architecture and hyperparameters through cross-validation and performance metrics, achieving superior prediction precision while managing complexity through automated model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11610272B1Predicting crop yield with a crop prediction engine
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 ARVA INTELLIGENCE CORP
  • US11610272B1 patent drawing
  • US11610272B1 patent drawing
  • US11610272B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for predicting a crop yield for a type of seed in a location is described. The method includes receiving, at a client device, seasonal crop data for the type of seed, soil data associated with the location, and mapping data associated with the location. The soil data includes soil variables, and the location is represented by voxels. The seasonal crop data, the soil data and the mapping data are uploaded to a geospatial database associated with a crop prediction engine. A random forest prediction model is applied to the seasonal crop data, the soil data and mapping data in the geospatial database by the crop prediction engine, which then ranks covariates to determine one or more significant covariates. The crop prediction engine then re-applies the significant covariates to the random forest prediction model to predict the crop yield for the type of seed at the location.