Forage Harvester Crop Roll Chevron Grooves Bearing Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional corn processing rolls in forage harvesters limit harvesting speed due to centrifugal force and bearing limitations, and increasing speed results in kernels passing uncracked or uneven bearing wear.

Innovation Solution

The design features longitudinally oriented grooves intersected by chevron or semi-chevron helical grooves that distribute crop material evenly across the rolls, reducing stress on bearings and maintaining kernel cracking efficiency without increasing rotation speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the corn processing rolls are run at higher speeds to increase harvesting capacity, then the productivity increases, but the reliability deteriorates due to centrifugal force limits and bearing failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting speedVSAvoidbearing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous helical groove is segmented into discrete chevron or semi-chevron grooves spaced along the roll circumference. This segmentation creates distinct material discharge zones that reduce continuous centrifugal loading on the bearings, allowing higher operating speeds without bearing failure while maintaining effective kernel cracking through the distributed groove pattern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chevron grooves are spaced at specific intervals around the roll circumference to create periodic material discharge zones. This periodic action allows the roll to operate at higher speeds by providing regular stress relief cycles, preventing continuous centrifugal force buildup that would otherwise limit operating speed and bearing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Stress or pressure

If the peaks on the roll surfaces are spaced farther apart to reduce centrifugal force, then the bearing stress decreases, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates as kernels pass between rolls uncracked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing stressVSAvoidkernel cracking effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a single continuous helical groove to multiple discrete chevron grooves distributed around the roll circumference. This dimensional change creates multiple material discharge zones that maintain effective kernel cracking intervals while increasing the average peak spacing, thereby reducing bearing stress without sacrificing cracking effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The chevron groove pattern acts as an intermediary structure between the roll surface and kernels. The grooves are positioned and sized to provide adequate material discharge and cracking action while maintaining appropriate peak spacing to reduce bearing stress, effectively mediating between the conflicting requirements of stress reduction and cracking effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a continuous helical groove is used to maintain kernel cracking, then the kernel cracking effectiveness is maintained, but the device complexity increases and causes uneven bearing wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekernel cracking effectivenessVSAvoidgroove configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous helical groove is divided into multiple discrete chevron or semi-chevron grooves spaced around the roll. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing process compared to machining a continuous helical groove, while the distributed pattern maintains effective kernel cracking through multiple material discharge zones and reduces uneven bearing wear through periodic stress distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the operating life of bearings, ensures equal loading on both bearings, and increases the capacity for kernel cracking without sacrificing operational quality or speed.

Implementation Method 1

Known prior art machines have attempted to overcome this limitation by running the corn processing rolls at higher speeds, but have had limited success because of centrifugal force limits on the rolls and speed limitations on the bearings rotatably supporting the corn processing rolls.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

The crop material can pass through this gap after being chopped into small pieces by the rotating cutterhead to crack the kernels of corn that may be in the flow of crop material exiting the cutterhead.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The crop material can pass through this gap after being chopped into small pieces by the rotating cutterhead to crack the kernels of corn

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP3295786B1Crop processing roll for a forage harvester
Publication Date: 2021.10.27 HORNING MANUFACTURING LLC
  • EP3295786B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3295786B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3295786B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A crop processing roll is disclosed for use in a forage harvester to process crop material comminuted by the operation of the forage harvester (10) before being discharged from the forage harvester. The processing roll (22) comprises an elongate cylindrical body of which the cylindrical outer surface is formed with a set of first grooves (23) extending generally lengthways of the cylindrical body, ridges (24) being defined between the first grooves (23). A set of second grooves (32, 35) is formed in the cylindrical outer surface which extend generally circumferentially (32) or helically (35) so as to intersect the first grooves (23) and pass through said ridges (24), thereby breaking said ridges into discrete teeth. The teeth defined by the intersecting first and second grooves are configured to ensure that crop material engaged by said processing roll does not migrate towards either axial one end of the processing roll.