Crop Yield Prediction via Multi-Model Ensembling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting crop yield in agricultural fields are incomplete and inaccurate due to reliance on single data sources, lacking a comprehensive integration of remotely-sensed data, historical data, and crop-specific growth stages, which limits the reliability and precision of yield predictions.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines pre-season, in-season, statistical imagery, histogram-based image, and crop-specific models using machine learning techniques to aggregate remotely-sensed and historical data, including weather and soil characteristics, to generate a final crop yield prediction by ensembling or stacking predictions from multiple models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple data sources and models are integrated to improve yield prediction accuracy, then prediction reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield prediction reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the yield prediction task into multiple independent models (pre-season model, in-season model, statistical imagery model, histogram-based image model, and crop-specific models). Each model processes specific data sources independently, and their predictions are then combined through ensembling or stacking. This segmentation allows the system to leverage diverse data sources without creating a single monolithic complex system, improving reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges predictions from multiple independent models through ensembling or stacking techniques. By combining the outputs of pre-season models, in-season models, imagery models, and crop-specific models, the system achieves more reliable yield predictions than any single model could provide alone. This merging approach leverages the strengths of different models and data sources while distributing the computational complexity across multiple specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If remotely-sensed data and historical data are aggregated by crop-specific growth stages to improve prediction precision, then measurement precision is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield prediction precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining crop-specific growth stages and their associated temporal windows before processing the actual yield prediction. Historical weather data, soil characteristics, and remotely-sensed imagery are pre-processed and organized according to these predetermined growth stage frameworks. This preliminary organization allows the system to precisely align data with relevant crop development phases without complex real-time processing during prediction, improving measurement precision while managing data processing complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If crop-specific models with growth stage timing windows are applied to improve yield prediction accuracy, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on specific crop-specific growth stages and their associated timing windows rather than processing all possible data continuously. Each crop-specific model is trained and applied only for its relevant growth stage period (e.g., flowering stage for water usage, pollination stage for temperature). This selective application improves prediction accuracy for critical periods while reducing overall computational energy requirements compared to continuous full-scale processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11321941B2Yield forecasting using crop specific features and growth stages
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 FARMERS EDGE INC
  • US11321941B2 patent drawing
  • US11321941B2 patent drawing
  • US11321941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting crop yield of an agricultural field may include steps of applying a pre-season model to provide a pre-season model crop yield prediction, applying an in-season model to provide an in-season model crop yield prediction, applying a statistical imagery model to provide a statistical imagery model crop yield prediction, applying a histogram-based image model to provide a histogram-based image model crop yield prediction, applying crop-specific models to provide at least one crop-specific model crop yield prediction, and combining at a computing system crop yield predictions from a plurality of models within a set comprising the pre-season model, the in-season model, the statistical imagery model, the histogram-based image model, and the crop-specific models, to produce a final crop yield prediction.