Cross-Activated Pressure Relief Venting for Multi-Tank Backflow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-tank systems, when one tank is exposed to a fire, the pressurized fluid from unaffected tanks can flow back into the affected tank, slowing down the venting process and increasing the risk of rupture, as existing relief devices may not effectively manage pressure distribution across interconnected vessels.

Innovation Solution

A pressure relief apparatus with a trigger mechanism that responds to temperature or pressure thresholds, featuring a closure member and a compartment to control fluid communication between inlet and outlet ports, ensuring safe venting by preventing backflow and facilitating efficient pressure release across interconnected tanks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple pressure vessels are connected together in fluid communication to increase storage capacity, then storage capacity is improved, but the risk of vessel rupture increases when one vessel is exposed to fire because pressurized fluid from unaffected vessels can flow into the affected vessel and refill it during venting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidvessel rupture risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A trigger mechanism acts as an intermediary between the unaffected vessels and the affected vessel. When the trigger mechanism detects fire conditions (temperature or pressure threshold) in one vessel, it automatically activates the relief valve to vent the affected vessel, preventing backflow from unaffected vessels and eliminating the refilling problem while maintaining multi-vessel connectivity for increased storage capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a single relief valve is used for multiple vessels to simplify the system, then device complexity is reduced, but the relief capability is insufficient for smaller vessels and requires complex connections that must be kept free of impediments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidrelief effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Each pressure vessel is equipped with its own dedicated relief valve and trigger mechanism, segmenting the relief function at the vessel level. This eliminates complex inter-vessel connections while ensuring each vessel has adequate relief capability independent of vessel size, as each unit's trigger mechanism responds locally to conditions in its associated vessel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the relief device vents the affected vessel quickly to prevent rupture, then vessel rupture risk is reduced, but the venting time increases when backflow from unaffected vessels continuously refills the affected vessel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel rupture preventionVSAvoidventing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger mechanism performs preliminary detection of fire conditions (temperature or pressure threshold) and activates the relief valve before the affected vessel can be significantly refilled by backflow from unaffected vessels. This preemptive action prevents the continuous refilling problem from developing, allowing the vessel to be vented quickly without the time-consuming backflow issue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient and controlled venting of pressurized tanks, reducing the risk of rupture and exposure to fire by managing pressure distribution and preventing backflow of pressurized fluid, thus enhancing safety in multi-tank systems.

Implementation Method 1

the closure member becomes released from retention and moveable for effecting establishment of fluid communication between the inlet port and the outlet port in response to receiving of heat energy by the temperature responsive portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy reception: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a compartment for receiving pressurized fluid from the outlet port and communicating the received pressurized fluid to the trigger mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11326704B2Cross-activated pressure relief apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 EMCARA INTERNATIONAL ULC
  • US11326704B2 patent drawing
  • US11326704B2 patent drawing
  • US11326704B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure relief apparatus for venting a tank comprising an inlet port, an outlet port, a closure member retained, relative to the inlet and outlet ports, for preventing, or substantially preventing, fluid communication between the inlet port and the outlet port, a trigger mechanism including a temperature response portion, and a compartment for receiving pressurized fluid from the outlet port and communicating the received pressurized fluid to the trigger mechanism. The trigger mechanism and the closure member are cooperatively configured to release the closure member and establish fluid communication between the inlet port and the outlet port, thereby venting the tank, upon detection of a temperature at or above a predetermined temperature threshold or upon pressurization of the compartment at or above a predetermined pressure threshold.