Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and program for modifying control content of appliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cookers require manual user input to adjust cooking parameters based on visual assessment of doneness, and these changes are not effectively shared between different appliances.

Innovation Solution

An information processing method that modifies cooking parameters by identifying similar functional blocks across different appliances based on user preferences and modification values stored in a database, allowing for the reflection of parameter changes across various appliances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If cooking parameters are manually adjusted based on visual assessment, then cooking control flexibility is improved, but user operation complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking control flexibilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts cooking parameters by analyzing user feedback from multiple appliances without requiring manual intervention. The cooking control unit receives execution results from different appliances, determines parameter adjustments automatically, and updates the block sequence without user involvement, enabling the system to serve itself in optimizing cooking parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where execution results from cooking appliances are continuously monitored and fed back to the cooking control unit. This feedback includes cooking outcomes and user preferences, which are used to automatically adjust cooking parameters and refine future cooking sequences, creating a self-improving system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If cooking parameters are adjusted for one appliance, then cooking precision for that appliance is improved, but parameter consistency across different appliances deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking parameter precisionVSAvoidparameter consistency across appliances
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal cooking parameter adjustment mechanism that works across multiple appliance types. The cooking control unit maintains a shared block sequence that can be executed by different appliances, ensuring that parameter adjustments made for one appliance are automatically adapted and applied to other appliances, achieving both precision and consistency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges parameter adjustment data from multiple appliances into a unified cooking parameter set. By combining execution results from different appliances and consolidating the learned parameters into a single block sequence, the system achieves both appliance-specific precision and cross-appliance consistency through data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If manual visual assessment is used to determine doneness, then cooking accuracy is improved, but automation level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoneness assessment accuracyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual visual assessment with automated image recognition technology. The cooking control unit captures images of the cooked food and uses AI-based analysis to objectively determine doneness, substituting the mechanical human eye and brain with an automated vision system that provides both high accuracy and full automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-assessment of cooking doneness through automated image analysis without requiring user intervention. The cooking control unit independently evaluates cooking outcomes, determines whether additional cooking is needed, and adjusts parameters automatically, enabling the system to assess and optimize its own performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250231799A1Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and program for modifying control content of appliance
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • US20250231799A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231799A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231799A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver receives information on a first block sequence that is a block sequence scheduled to be executed by an appliance, and the specifier specifies a second block similar to a first block included in the first block sequence from a second block sequence that is a block sequence having already been executed. A processor modifies the first block based on a determination flag indicating a preference of a user for the second block and a modification value for a parameter of the second block. An outputter outputs the first block sequence including the modified first block.